Referências

1.

Grami A. Discrete Probability. Em: Discrete Mathematics: Essentials and Applications. Elsevier; 2023:285–305. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-820656-0.00016-2

2.

Viti A, Terzi A, Bertolaccini L. A practical overview on probability distributions. Journal of Thoracic Disease. 2015;7(3). https://jtd.amegroups.org/article/view/4086.

3.

Benford F. The Law of Anomalous Numbers. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. 1938;78(4):551–572. http://www.jstor.org/stable/984802. Acessado novembro 24, 2024.

4.

Hill TP. A Statistical Derivation of the Significant-Digit Law. Statistical Science. 1995;10(4). doi:10.1214/ss/1177009869

5.

Tversky A, Kahneman D. Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin. 1971;76(2):105–110. doi:10.1037/h0031322

6.

Bishop DVM, Thompson J, Parker AJ. Can we shift belief in the ‘Law of Small Numbers’? Royal Society Open Science. 2022;9(3). doi:10.1098/rsos.211028

7.

Guy RK. The Strong Law of Small Numbers. The American Mathematical Monthly. 1988;95(8):697. doi:10.2307/2322249

8.

Guy RK. The Second Strong Law of Small Numbers. Mathematics Magazine. 1990;63(1):3–20. doi:10.1080/0025570x.1990.11977475

9.

Seneta E. A Tricentenary history of the Law of Large Numbers. Bernoulli. 2013;19(4). doi:10.3150/12-bejsp12

10.

Kwak SG, Kim JH. Central limit theorem: the cornerstone of modern statistics. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. 2017;70(2):144. doi:10.4097/kjae.2017.70.2.144

11.

Galton F. Regression Towards Mediocrity in Hereditary Stature. The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. 1886;15:246. doi:10.2307/2841583

12.

Barnett AG. Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2004;34(1):215–220. doi:10.1093/ije/dyh299

13.

Senn S. Francis Galton and Regression to the Mean. Significance. 2011;8(3):124–126. doi:10.1111/j.1740-9713.2011.00509.x

14.

Recchia D. regtomean: Regression Toward the Mean.; 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=regtomean.

15.

Altman DG, Bland JM. Statistics Notes: Units of analysis. BMJ. 1997;314(7098):1874–1874. doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7098.1874

16.

Matthews JN, Altman DG, Campbell MJ, Royston P. Analysis of serial measurements in medical research. BMJ. 1990;300(6719):230–235. doi:10.1136/bmj.300.6719.230

17.

Banerjee A, Chaudhury S. Statistics without tears: Populations and samples. Industrial Psychiatry Journal. 2010;19(1):60. doi:10.4103/0972-6748.77642

18.

Martínez-Mesa J, González-Chica DA, Duquia RP, Bonamigo RR, Bastos JL. Sampling: how to select participants in my research study? Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia. 2016;91(3):326–330. doi:10.1590/abd1806-4841.20165254

19.

Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics Notes: Bootstrap resampling methods. BMJ. 2015;350(jun02 13):h2622–h2622. doi:10.1136/bmj.h2622

20.

Amatuzzi MLL, Barreto M do CC, Litvoc J, Leme LEG. Linguagem metodológica: parte 1. Acta Ortopédica Brasileira. 2006;14(1):53–56. doi:10.1590/s1413-78522006000100012

21.

Amatuzzi MLL, Barreto M do CC, Litvoc J, Leme LEG. Linguagem metodológica: parte 2. Acta Ortopédica Brasileira. 2006;14(2):108–112. doi:10.1590/s1413-78522006000200012

22.

Munafò MR, Nosek BA, Bishop DVM, et al. A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour. 2017;1(1). doi:10.1038/s41562-016-0021

23.

Wood M, Welch C. Are ‘Qualitative’ and ‘Quantitative’ Useful Terms for Describing Research? Methodological Innovations Online. 2010;5(1):56–71. doi:10.4256/mio.2010.0010

24.

Lall D. Mixed-Methods Research. Indian Journal of Continuing Nursing Education. 2021;22(2):143–147. doi:10.4103/ijcn.ijcn_107_21

25.

Sandelowski M. Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Sampling, Data Collection, and Analysis Techniques in Mixed-Method Studies. Research in Nursing & Health. 2000;23(3):246–255. doi:10.1002/1098-240x(200006)23:3<246::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-h

26.

Schoonenboom J, Johnson RB. How to Construct a Mixed Methods Research Design. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. 2017;69(S2):107–131. doi:10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1

27.

Rubin M, Donkin C. Exploratory hypothesis tests can be more compelling than confirmatory hypothesis tests. Philosophical Psychology. 2022;37(8):2019–2047. doi:10.1080/09515089.2022.2113771

28.

Späth C. From best practices to severe testing: A methodological response to Büsch and Loffing (2024). German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research. outubro 2025. doi:10.1007/s12662-025-01072-7

29.

Resnik DB, Shamoo AE. Reproducibility and Research Integrity. Accountability in Research. 2016;24(2):116–123. doi:10.1080/08989621.2016.1257387

30.

Hofner B, Schmid M, Edler L. Reproducible research in statistics: A review and guidelines for the Biometrical Journal. Biometrical Journal. 2015;58(2):416–427. doi:10.1002/bimj.201500156

31.

Mair P. Thou Shalt Be Reproducible! A Technology Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology. 2016;7. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01079

32.

Hinsen K. A data and code model for reproducible research and executable papers. Procedia Computer Science. 2011;4:579–588. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2011.04.061

33.

Gamble C, Krishan A, Stocken D, et al. Guidelines for the Content of Statistical Analysis Plans in Clinical Trials. JAMA. 2017;318(23):2337. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.18556

34.

Kahan BC, Hindley J, Edwards M, Cro S, Morris TP. The estimands framework: a primer on the ICH E9(R1) addendum. BMJ. janeiro 2024:e076316. doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-076316

35.

Polit DF, Beck CT. Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: Myths and strategies. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2010;47(11):1451–1458. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.06.004

36.

Ihaka R, Gentleman R. R: A Language for Data Analysis and Graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics. 1996;5(3):299. doi:10.2307/1390807

37.

Nwanganga F, Chapple M. Introduction to R and RStudio. Em: Nwanganga F, Chapple M, orgs. Practical Machine Learning in R. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2020:25–52. doi:10.1002/9781119591542.ch2

38.

R Core Team. The Comprehensive R Archive Network. 2021. https://cran.r-project.org.

39.

Allaire J, Xie Y, Dervieux C, et al. rmarkdown: Dynamic Documents for R.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rmarkdown.

40.

Holmes DT, Mobini M, McCudden CR. Reproducible manuscript preparation with RMarkdown application to JMSACL and other Elsevier Journals. Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab. 2021;22:8–16. doi:10.1016/j.jmsacl.2021.09.002

41.

Love J, Selker R, Marsman M, et al. JASP: Graphical Statistical Software for Common Statistical Designs. Journal of Statistical Software. 2019;88(2). doi:10.18637/jss.v088.i02

42.

ŞAHİN M, AYBEK E. Jamovi: An Easy to Use Statistical Software for the Social Scientists. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education. 2020;6(4):670–692. doi:10.21449/ijate.661803

43.

Selker R, Love J, Dropmann D. jmv: The jamovi Analyses.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=jmv.

44.

Love J. jmvconnect: Connect to the jamovi Statistical Spreadsheet.; 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=jmvconnect.

45.

Racine JS. RStudio: A Platform-Independent IDE for R and Sweave. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 2011;27(1):167–172. doi:10.1002/jae.1278

46.

Aden-Buie G, Schloerke B, Allaire J, Rossell Hayes A. learnr: Interactive Tutorials for R.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=learnr.

47.

Schwab, Simon, Held, Leonhard. Statistical programming: Small mistakes, big impacts. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc. 2021. doi:10.5167/UZH-205154

48.

Eglen SJ, Marwick B, Halchenko YO, et al. Toward standard practices for sharing computer code and programs in neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience. 2017;20(6):770–773. doi:10.1038/nn.4550

49.

Xie Y. formatR: Format R Code Automatically.; 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=formatR.

50.

Müller K, Walthert L. styler: Non-Invasive Pretty Printing of R Code.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=styler.

51.

Hester J, Angly F, Hyde R, et al. lintr: A Linter for R Code.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lintr.

52.

All R CRAN packages [Full List]. 2025. https://r-packages.io/packages. Acessado fevereiro 11, 2025.

53.

R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2023. https://www.R-project.org/.

54.

Wickham H, Danenberg P, Csárdi G, Eugster M. roxygen2: In-Line Documentation for R.; 2024. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.roxygen2

55.

Brun J, Janée G, Curty RG. Ten quick tips for developing a reproducible Shiny application. Ouellette F, org. PLOS Computational Biology. 2025;21(10):e1013551. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013551

56.

Trisovic A, Lau MK, Pasquier T, Crosas M. A large-scale study on research code quality and execution. Scientific Data. 2022;9(1). doi:10.1038/s41597-022-01143-6

57.

Gohel D, Ross N. officedown: Enhanced R Markdown Format for Word and PowerPoint.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=officedown.

58.

Xie Y. bookdown: Authoring Books and Technical Documents with R Markdown. Chapman; Hall/CRC; 2023. https://bookdown.org/yihui/bookdown/.

59.

Ioannidis JPA. How to Make More Published Research True. PLoS Medicine. 2014;11(10):e1001747. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001747

60.

Krieger N, Perzynski A, Dalton J. projects: A Project Infrastructure for Researchers.; 2021. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=projects.

61.

Schultze A, Tazare J. The role of programming code sharing in improving the transparency of medical research. BMJ. outubro 2023:p2402. doi:10.1136/bmj.p2402

62.

R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2023. https://www.R-project.org/.

63.

Zhao Y, Xiao N, Anderson K, Zhang Y. Electronic common technical document submission with analysis using R. Clinical Trials. 2022;20(1):89–92. doi:10.1177/17407745221123244

64.

Francisco Rodríguez-Sánchez, Connor P. Jackson, Shaurita D. Hutchins. grateful: Facilitate citation of R packages.; 2023. https://github.com/Pakillo/grateful.

65.

Shields M. Information Literacy, Statistical Literacy, Data Literacy. IASSIST Quarterly. 2005;28(2):6. doi:10.29173/iq790

66.

Gal I. Adults’ Statistical Literacy: Meanings, Components, Responsibilities. International Statistical Review. 2002;70(1):1–25. doi:10.1111/j.1751-5823.2002.tb00336.x

67.

Sharma S. Definitions and models of statistical literacy: a literature review. Open Review of Educational Research. 2017;4(1):118–133. doi:10.1080/23265507.2017.1354313

68.

Hidayati NA, Waluya SB, Rochmad, Wardono. Statistics literacy: what, why and how? Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2020;1613(1):012080. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1613/1/012080

69.

GOULD R. DATA LITERACY IS STATISTICAL LITERACY. STATISTICS EDUCATION RESEARCH JOURNAL. 2017;16(1):22–25. doi:10.52041/serj.v16i1.209

70.

CALLINGHAM R, WATSON JM. THE DEVELOPMENT OF STATISTICAL LITERACY AT SCHOOL. STATISTICS EDUCATION RESEARCH JOURNAL. 2017;16(1):181–201. doi:10.52041/serj.v16i1.223

71.

Koga S. Characteristics of statistical literacy skills from the perspective of critical thinking. Teaching Statistics. 2022;44(2):59–67. doi:10.1111/test.12302

72.

Sackett DL. Bias in analytic research. Journal of Chronic Diseases. 1979;32(1-2):51–63. doi:10.1016/0021-9681(79)90012-2

73.

Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Bias and causal associations in observational research. The Lancet. 2002;359(9302):248–252. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07451-2

74.

Smith J, Noble H. Bias in research. Evidence Based Nursing. 2014;17(4):100–101. doi:10.1136/eb-2014-101946

75.

Nickerson RS. Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises. Review of General Psychology. 1998;2(2):175–220. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175

76.

Song, Eastwood, Gilbody, Duley, Sutton. Publication and related biases. Health Technology Assessment. 2000;4(10). doi:10.3310/hta4100

77.

Wolff RF, Moons KGM, Riley RD, et al. PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2019;170(1):51–58. doi:10.7326/m18-1376

78.

Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. agosto 2019:l4898. doi:10.1136/bmj.l4898

79.

Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. setembro 2017:j4008. doi:10.1136/bmj.j4008

80.

Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. outubro 2016:i4919. doi:10.1136/bmj.i4919

81.

Whiting P, Savović J, Higgins JPT, et al. ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2016;69:225–234. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005

82.

Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME, et al. QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2011;155(8):529–536. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009

83.

Polin BA, Benisaac E. A longitudinal analysis of the hot hand and gambler’s fallacy biases. Judgment and Decision Making. 2023;18. doi:10.1017/jdm.2023.23

84.

Meng XL. Statistical paradises and paradoxes in big data (I): Law of large populations, big data paradox, and the 2016 US presidential election. The Annals of Applied Statistics. 2018;12(2). doi:10.1214/18-aoas1161sf

85.

Abelson RP. A variance explanation paradox: When a little is a lot. Psychological Bulletin. 1985;97(1):129–133. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.97.1.129

86.

Berkson J. Limitations of the Application of Fourfold Table Analysis to Hospital Data. Biometrics Bulletin. 1946;2(3):47. doi:10.2307/3002000

87.

Ellsberg D. Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1961;75(4):643. doi:10.2307/1884324

88.

Freedman DA, Freedman DA. A Note on Screening Regression Equations. The American Statistician. 1983;37(2):152–155. doi:10.1080/00031305.1983.10482729

89.

Freedman LS, Pee D. Return to a Note on Screening Regression Equations. The American Statistician. 1989;43(4):279. doi:10.2307/2685389

90.

Hand DJ. On Comparing Two Treatments. The American Statistician. 1992;46(3):190–192. doi:10.1080/00031305.1992.10475881

91.

LINDLEY DV. A STATISTICAL PARADOX. Biometrika. 1957;44(1-2):187–192. doi:10.1093/biomet/44.1-2.187

92.

Lord FM. A paradox in the interpretation of group comparisons. Psychological Bulletin. 1967;68(5):304–305. doi:10.1037/h0025105

93.

Lord FM. Statistical adjustments when comparing preexisting groups. Psychological Bulletin. 1969;72(5):336–337. doi:10.1037/h0028108

94.

Simpson EH. The Interpretation of Interaction in Contingency Tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological). 1951;13(2):238–241. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1951.tb00088.x

95.

Blyth CR. On Simpson’s Paradox and the Sure-Thing Principle. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1972;67(338):364–366. doi:10.1080/01621459.1972.10482387

96.

Pearl J. Comment: Understanding Simpson’s Paradox. The American Statistician. 2014;68(1):8–13. doi:10.1080/00031305.2014.876829

97.

Stein C. INADMISSIBILITY OF THE USUAL ESTIMATOR FOR THE MEAN OF A MULTIVARIATE NORMAL DISTRIBUTION. Em: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Volume I. University of California Press; 1956:197–206. doi:10.1525/9780520313880-018

98.

James W, Stein C. Estimation with Quadratic Loss. Em: Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Volume 1: Contributions to the Theory of Statistics. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press; 1961:361–379. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.bsmsp/1200512173.

99.

De S, Sen A. The generalised Gamow-Stern problem. The Mathematical Gazette. 1996;80(488):345–348. doi:10.2307/3619568

100.

Feld SL. Why Your Friends Have More Friends Than You Do. American Journal of Sociology. 1991;96(6):1464–1477. doi:10.1086/229693

101.

John LK, Loewenstein G, Prelec D. Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling. Psychological Science. 2012;23(5):524–532. doi:10.1177/0956797611430953

102.

Bausell RB. Too Much Medicine: Not Enough Health. Em: The Problem with Science: The Reproducibility Crisis and What to do About It. New York: Oxford University Press; 2021:56–C3.P203. doi:10.1093/oso/9780197536537.003.0004

103.

Neoh MJY, Carollo A, Lee A, Esposito G. Fifty years of research on questionable research practises in science: quantitative analysis of co-citation patterns. Royal Society Open Science. 2023;10(10). doi:10.1098/rsos.230677

104.

Kleinert S. COPE’s retraction guidelines. The Lancet. 2009;374(9705):1876–1877. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)62074-2

105.

Kerr NL. HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 1998;2(3):196–217. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4

106.

Groot AD de. The meaning of “significance” for different types of research [translated and annotated by Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Denny Borsboom, Josine Verhagen, Rogier Kievit, Marjan Bakker, Angelique Cramer, Dora Matzke, Don Mellenbergh, and Han L. J. van der Maas]. Acta Psychologica. 2014;148:188–194. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.02.001

107.

Andrade C. HARKing, Cherry-Picking, P-Hacking, Fishing Expeditions, and Data Dredging and Mining as Questionable Research Practices. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2021;82(1). doi:10.4088/jcp.20f13804

108.

Stefan AM, Schönbrodt FD. Big little lies: a compendium and simulation ofp-hacking strategies. Royal Society Open Science. 2023;10(2). doi:10.1098/rsos.220346

109.

Chuard PJC, Vrtílek M, Head ML, Jennions MD. Evidence that nonsignificant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting? PLOS Biology. 2019;17(1):e3000127. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000127

110.

Sasaki K, Yamada Y. SPARKing: Sample-size planning after the results are known. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2023;17. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2023.912338

111.

Armitage P, McPherson CK, Rowe BC. Repeated Significance Tests on Accumulating Data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General). 1969;132(2):235. doi:10.2307/2343787

112.

Hutton JL, Williamson PR. Bias in Meta-Analysis Due to Outcome Variable Selection Within Studies. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics. 2000;49(3):359–370. doi:10.1111/1467-9876.00197

113.

Horton R. The rhetoric of research. BMJ. 1995;310(6985):985–987. doi:10.1136/bmj.310.6985.985

114.

Chiu K, Grundy Q, Bero L. ‘Spin’ in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review. Boutron I, org. PLOS Biology. 2017;15(9):e2002173. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2002173

115.

Picano E. Who is the author: genuine, honorary, ghost, gold, and fake authors? Exploration of Cardiology. 2024;2(3):88–96. doi:10.37349/ec.2024.00024

116.

Montori VM, Smieja M, Guyatt GH. Publication Bias: A Brief Review for Clinicians. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2000;75(12):1284–1288. doi:10.4065/75.12.1284

117.

Nosek BA, Ebersole CR, DeHaven AC, Mellor DT. The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018;115(11):2600–2606. doi:10.1073/pnas.1708274114

118.

P. Simmons J, D. Nelson L, Simonsohn U. Pre-registration: Why and How. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 2021;31(1):151–162. doi:10.1002/jcpy.1208

119.

Hartgerink C, Aust F. retractcheck: Retraction Scanner.; 2025. https://github.com/chartgerink/retractcheck.

120.

Altman DG, Bland JM. Statistics notes Variables and parameters. BMJ. 1999;318(7199):1667–1667. doi:10.1136/bmj.318.7199.1667

121.

Vetter TR. Fundamentals of Research Data and Variables. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2017;125(4):1375–1380. doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000002370

122.

Ali Z, Bhaskar Sb. Basic statistical tools in research and data analysis. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2016;60(9):662. doi:10.4103/0019-5049.190623

123.

Dettori JR, Norvell DC. The Anatomy of Data. Global Spine Journal. 2018;8(3):311–313. doi:10.1177/2192568217746998

124.

Kaliyadan F, Kulkarni V. Types of variables, descriptive statistics, and sample size. Indian Dermatology Online Journal. 2019;10(1):82. doi:10.4103/idoj.idoj_468_18

125.

Barkan H. Statistics in clinical research: Important considerations. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia. 2015;18(1):74. doi:10.4103/0971-9784.148325

126.

Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics Notes: Transforming data. BMJ. 1996;312(7033):770–770. doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7033.770

127.

Fedorov V, Mannino F, Zhang R. Consequences of dichotomization. Pharmaceutical Statistics. 2009;8(1):50–61. doi:10.1002/pst.331

128.

Osborne J. Improving your data transformations: Applying the Box-Cox transformation. University of Massachusetts Amherst. 2010. doi:10.7275/QBPC-GK17

129.

Box GEP, Cox DR. An Analysis of Transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological). 1964;26(2):211–243. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x

130.

Venables WN, Ripley BD. Modern Applied Statistics with S. Springer; 2002. https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/MASS4/.

131.

MacCallum RC, Zhang S, Preacher KJ, Rucker DD. On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods. 2002;7(1):19–40. doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.19

132.

Altman DG, Royston P. The cost of dichotomising continuous variables. BMJ. 2006;332(7549):1080.1. doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7549.1080

133.

Royston P, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W. Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea. Statistics in Medicine. 2005;25(1):127–141. doi:10.1002/sim.2331

134.

Collins GS, Ogundimu EO, Cook JA, Manach YL, Altman DG. Quantifying the impact of different approaches for handling continuous predictors on the performance of a prognostic model. Statistics in Medicine. 2016;35(23):4124–4135. doi:10.1002/sim.6986

135.

Nelson SLP, Ramakrishnan V, Nietert PJ, Kamen DL, Ramos PS, Wolf BJ. An evaluation of common methods for dichotomization of continuous variables to discriminate disease status. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods. 2017;46(21):10823–10834. doi:10.1080/03610926.2016.1248783

136.

Bennette C, Vickers A. Against quantiles: categorization of continuous variables in epidemiologic research, and its discontents. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2012;12(1). doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-21

137.

Barnier J, Briatte F, Larmarange J. questionr: Functions to Make Surveys Processing Easier.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=questionr.

138.

Aguinis H, Pierce CA, Culpepper SA. Scale Coarseness as a Methodological Artifact. Organizational Research Methods. 2008;12(4):623–652. doi:10.1177/1094428108318065

139.

Youden WJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer. 1950;3(1):32–35. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::aid-cncr2820030106>3.0.co;2-3

140.

Strobl C, Boulesteix AL, Augustin T. Unbiased split selection for classification trees based on the Gini Index. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis. 2007;52(1):483–501. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2006.12.030

141.

Pearson K. X. On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 1900;50(302):157–175. doi:10.1080/14786440009463897

142.

Greiner M, Pfeiffer D, Smith RD. Principles and practical application of the receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2000;45(1-2):23–41. doi:10.1016/s0167-5877(00)00115-x

143.

Fleiss JL. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin. 1971;76(5):378–382. doi:10.1037/h0031619

144.

R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.; 2025. https://www.R-project.org/.

145.

Olson K. What Are Data? Qualitative Health Research. 2021;31(9):1567–1569. doi:10.1177/10497323211015960

146.

Smeden M van. A Very Short List of Common Pitfalls in Research Design, Data Analysis, and Reporting. PRiMER. 2022;6. doi:10.22454/PRiMER.2022.511416

147.

Baillie M, Cessie S le, Schmidt CO, Lusa L, Huebner M. Ten simple rules for initial data analysis. PLOS Computational Biology. 2022;18(2):e1009819. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009819

148.

Buttliere B. Adopting standard variable labels solves many of the problems with sharing and reusing data. Methodological Innovations. 2021;14(2):205979912110266. doi:10.1177/20597991211026616

149.

Pebesma E, Mailund T, Hiebert J. Measurement Units in R. The R Journal. 2016;8. doi:10.32614/RJ-2016-061

150.

Firke S. janitor: Simple Tools for Examining and Cleaning Dirty Data.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=janitor.

151.

Harrell Jr FE. Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Hmisc.

152.

Reese A. Databases and Documenting Data. Significance. 2007;4(4):184–186. doi:10.1111/j.1740-9713.2007.00265.x

153.

Bryer J, Speerschneider K. likert: Analysis and Visualization Likert Items.; 2016. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=likert.

154.

Larmarange J. ggstats: Extension to ggplot2 for Plotting Stats.; 2025. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.ggstats

155.

Ferris TLJ. A new definition of measurement. Measurement. 2004;36(1):101–109. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2004.03.001

156.

Healy MJR, Goldstein H. Regression to the mean. Annals of Human Biology. 1978;5(3):277–280. doi:10.1080/03014467800002891

157.

Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison Studies. The Statistician. 1983;32(3):307. doi:10.2307/2987937

158.

Menditto A, Patriarca M, Magnusson B. Understanding the meaning of accuracy, trueness and precision. Accreditation and Quality Assurance. 2006;12(1):45–47. doi:10.1007/s00769-006-0191-z

159.

Streiner DL, Norman GR. “Precision” and “Accuracy”: Two Terms That Are Neither. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2006;59(4):327–330. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.09.005

160.

Tierney N, Cook D. Expanding Tidy Data Principles to Facilitate Missing Data Exploration, Visualization and Assessment of Imputations. Journal of Statistical Software. 2023;105(7). doi:10.18637/jss.v105.i07

161.

Hammill D. DataEditR: An Interactive Editor for Viewing, Entering, Filtering & Editing Data.; 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DataEditR.

162.

Broman KW, Woo KH. Data Organization in Spreadsheets. The American Statistician. 2018;72(1):2–10. doi:10.1080/00031305.2017.1375989

163.

Juluru K, Eng J. Use of Spreadsheets for Research Data Collection and Preparation: Academic Radiology. 2015;22(12):1592–1599. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2015.08.024

164.

Dowle M, Srinivasan A. data.table: Extension of ‘data.frame‘.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=data.table.

165.

Harron K. Data linkage in medical research. BMJ Medicine. 2022;1(1):e000087. doi:10.1136/bmjmed-2021-000087

166.

Altman DG, Bland JM. Missing data. BMJ. 2007;334(7590):424–424. doi:10.1136/bmj.38977.682025.2c

167.

Heymans MW, Twisk JWR. Handling missing data in clinical research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. setembro 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.08.016

168.

Carpenter JR, Smuk M. Missing data: A statistical framework for practice. Biometrical Journal. 2021;63(5):915–947. doi:10.1002/bimj.202000196

169.

Yanagida T. misty: Miscellaneous Functions.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=misty.

170.

Little RJA. A Test of Missing Completely at Random for Multivariate Data with Missing Values. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1988;83(404):1198–1202. doi:10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722

171.

Tierney N, Cook D. Expanding Tidy Data Principles to Facilitate Missing Data Exploration, Visualization and Assessment of Imputations. Journal of Statistical Software. 2023;105(7):1–31. doi:10.18637/jss.v105.i07

172.

Akl EA, Shawwa K, Kahale LA, et al. Reporting missing participant data in randomised trials: systematic survey of the methodological literature and a proposed guide. BMJ Open. 2015;5(12):e008431. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008431

173.

Austin PC, Buuren S van. Logistic regression vs. predictive mean matching for imputing binary covariates. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. setembro 2023. doi:10.1177/09622802231198795

174.

Buuren S van, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K. mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software. 2011;45:1–67. doi:10.18637/jss.v045.i03

175.

Rubin DB. Statistical Matching Using File Concatenation with Adjusted Weights and Multiple Imputations. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics. 1986;4(1):87. doi:10.2307/1391390

176.

Little RJA. Missing-Data Adjustments in Large Surveys. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics. 1988;6(3):287–296. doi:10.1080/07350015.1988.10509663

177.

Robitzsch A, Grund S. miceadds: Some Additional Multiple Imputation Functions, Especially for mice.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=miceadds.

178.

WILD C. THE CONCEPT OF DISTRIBUTION. STATISTICS EDUCATION RESEARCH JOURNAL. 2006;5(2):10–26. doi:10.52041/serj.v5i2.497

179.

S M. Frequency distribution. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics. 2011;2(1):54–56. doi:10.4103/0976-500x.77120

180.

Sturges HA. The Choice of a Class Interval. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1926;21(153):65–66. doi:10.1080/01621459.1926.10502161

181.

SCOTT DW. On optimal and data-based histograms. Biometrika. 1979;66(3):605–610. doi:10.1093/biomet/66.3.605

182.

Freedman D, Diaconis P. On the histogram as a density estimator:L 2 theory. Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete. 1981;57(4):453–476. doi:10.1007/bf01025868

183.

R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.; 2023. https://www.R-project.org/.

184.

Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer; 2016. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org.

185.

Kay M. ggdist: Visualizations of Distributions and Uncertainty in the Grammar of Graphics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. 2024;30(1):414–424. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2023.3327195

186.

Tang Y, Horikoshi M, Li W. ggfortify: Unified Interface to Visualize Statistical Result of Popular R Packages. Vol 8.; 2016. doi:10.32614/RJ-2016-060

187.

Darling HS. Do you have a standard way of interpreting the standard deviation? A narrative review. Cancer Research, Statistics, and Treatment. 2022;5(4):728–733. doi:10.4103/crst.crst_284_22

188.

Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper: Statistics for the non-statistician. I: Different types of data need different statistical tests. BMJ. 1997;315(7104):364–366. doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7104.364

189.

Schmider E, Ziegler M, Danay E, Beyer L, Bühner M. Is It Really Robust? Methodology. 2010;6(4):147–151. doi:10.1027/1614-2241/a000016

190.

Kanji G. 100 Statistical Tests. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2006. doi:10.4135/9781849208499

191.

Curran-Everett D. Explorations in statistics: standard deviations and standard errors. Advances in Physiology Education. 2008;32(3):203–208. doi:10.1152/advan.90123.2008

192.

Altman DG, Bland JM. Statistics Notes: Quartiles, quintiles, centiles, and other quantiles. BMJ. 1994;309(6960):996–996. doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6960.996

193.

S. M. Measures of central tendency: The mean. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics. 2011;2(2):140–142. doi:10.4103/0976-500x.81920

194.

S. M. Measures of central tendency: Median and mode. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics. 2011;2(3):214–215. doi:10.4103/0976-500x.83300

195.

Krzywinski M, Altman N. Error bars. Nature Methods. 2013;10(10):921–922. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2659

196.

Manikandan S. Measures of dispersion. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics. 2011;2(4):315–316. doi:10.4103/0976-500x.85931

197.

Sahai H, Misra S. Definitions of Sample Variance: Some Teaching Problems to be Overcome. The Statistician. 1992;41(1):55. doi:10.2307/2348636

198.

Daszykowski M, Kaczmarek K, Vander Heyden Y, Walczak B. Robust statistics in data analysis A review. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems. 2007;85(2):203–219. doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2006.06.016

199.

Rousseeuw PJ, Hubert M. Robust statistics for outlier detection. WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. 2011;1(1):73–79. doi:10.1002/widm.2

200.

Gadotti A, Rocher L, Houssiau F, Creţu AM, Montjoye YA de. Anonymization: The imperfect science of using data while preserving privacy. Science Advances. 2024;10(29). doi:10.1126/sciadv.adn7053

201.

Templ M, Kowarik A, Meindl B. Statistical Disclosure Control for Micro-Data Using theRPackagesdcMicro. Journal of Statistical Software. 2015;67(4). doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i04

202.

Giuffrè M, Shung DL. Harnessing the power of synthetic data in healthcare: innovation, application, and privacy. npj Digital Medicine. 2023;6(1). doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00927-3

203.

FitzJohn R. ids: Generate Random Identifiers.; 2017. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ids.

204.

Brown C. hash: Full Featured Implementation of Hash Tables/Associative Arrays/Dictionaries.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=hash.

205.

Hendricks P. anonymizer: Anonymize Data Containing Personally Identifiable Information.; 2023. https://github.com/paulhendricks/anonymizer.

206.

Lucas DE with contributions by A, Tuszynski J, Bengtsson H, et al. digest: Create Compact Hash Digests of R Objects.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=digest.

207.

Templ M, Kowarik A, Meindl B. Statistical Disclosure Control for Micro-Data Using the R Package sdcMicro. Vol 67.; 2015. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i04

208.

Naughton M, Weaving D, Scott T, Compton H. Synthetic Data as a Strategy to Resolve Data Privacy and Confidentiality Concerns in the Sport Sciences: Practical Examples and an R Shiny Application. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 2023;18(10):1213–1218. doi:10.1123/ijspp.2023-0007

209.

Nowok B, Raab GM, Dibben C. synthpop: Bespoke Creation of Synthetic Data in R. Journal of Statistical Software. 2016;74. doi:10.18637/jss.v074.i11

210.

Chatfield C. Exploratory data analysis. European Journal of Operational Research. 1986;23(1):5–13. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(86)90209-2

211.

Ferketich S, Verran J. Technical Notes. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 1986;8(4):464–466. doi:10.1177/019394598600800409

212.

Landis SC, Amara SG, Asadullah K, et al. A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research. Nature. 2012;490(7419):187–191. doi:10.1038/nature11556

213.

Huebner M, Vach W, Cessie S le. A systematic approach to initial data analysis is good research practice. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2016;151(1):25–27. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.09.085

214.

Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Elphick CS. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2009;1(1):3–14. doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2009.00001.x

215.

Krasser R. explore: Simplifies Exploratory Data Analysis.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=explore.

216.

Petersen AH, Ekstrøm CT. dataMaid: Your Assistant for Documenting Supervised Data Quality Screening in R. Journal of Statistical Software. 2019;90. doi:10.18637/jss.v090.i06

217.

Cui B. DataExplorer: Automate Data Exploration and Treatment.; 2020. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DataExplorer.

218.

Dayanand Ubrangala, R K, Prasad Kondapalli R, Putatunda S. SmartEDA: Summarize and Explore the Data.; 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=SmartEDA.

219.

Mock T. gtExtras: Extending gt for Beautiful HTML Tables.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gtExtras.

220.

Nijs V. radiant: Business Analytics using R and Shiny.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=radiant.

221.

Northrop PJ. anscombiser: Create Datasets with Identical Summary Statistics.; 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=anscombiser.

222.

Behrens JT. Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psychological Methods. 1997;2(2):131–160. doi:10.1037/1082-989x.2.2.131

223.

Prunello M, Mari G. ggcleveland: Implementation of Plots from Cleveland’s Visualizing Data Book.; 2021. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.ggcleveland

224.

Gerring J. Mere Description. British Journal of Political Science. 2012;42(4):721–746. doi:10.1017/s0007123412000130

225.

Cummings P, Rivara FP. Reporting Statistical Information in Medical Journal Articles. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. 2003;157(4):321. doi:10.1001/archpedi.157.4.321

226.

Cole TJ. Setting number of decimal places for reporting risk ratios: rule of four. BMJ. 2015;350(apr27 3):h1845–h1845. doi:10.1136/bmj.h1845

227.

Cole TJ. Too many digits: the presentation of numerical data. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2015;100(7):608–609. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2014-307149

228.

Weissgerber TL, Winham SJ, Heinzen EP, et al. Reveal, Don’t Conceal. Circulation. 2019;140(18):1506–1518. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.118.037777

229.

Mair P, Wilcox R. Robust Statistical Methods in R Using the WRS2 Package. Behavior Research Methods. 2020;52:464–488. doi:10.3758/s13428-019-01246-w

230.

Leys C, Delacre M, Mora YL, Lakens D, Ley C. How to Classify, Detect, and Manage Univariate and Multivariate Outliers, With Emphasis on Pre-Registration. International Review of Social Psychology. 2019;32(1). doi:10.5334/irsp.289

231.

Leys C, Ley C, Klein O, Bernard P, Licata L. Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2013;49(4):764–766. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.013

232.

Leys C, Klein O, Dominicy Y, Ley C. Detecting multivariate outliers: Use a robust variant of the Mahalanobis distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2018;74:150–156. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.09.011

233.

Tukey JW, McLaughlin DH. Less Vulnerable Confidence and Significance Procedures for Location Based on a Single Sample: Trimming/Winsorization 1. Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A (1961-2002). 1963;25(3):331–352. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25049278. Acessado abril 11, 2025.

234.

Komsta L. outliers: Tests for Outliers.; 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=outliers.

235.

Loh PL. A Theoretical Review of Modern Robust Statistics. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application. 2025;12(1):477–496. doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-112723-034446

236.

Mair P, Wilcox R, Indrajeet P. A Collection of Robust Statistical Methods.; 2025. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=WRS2.

237.

Lüdecke D. ggeffects: Tidy Data Frames of Marginal Effects from Regression Models. Journal of Open Source Software. 2018;3:772. doi:10.21105/joss.00772

238.

Song YY, Lu Y. Decision tree methods: applications for classification and prediction. Shanghai archives of psychiatry. 2015;27(2):130–135. doi:10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.215044

239.

Hozo I, Guyatt G, Djulbegovic B. Decision curve analysis based on summary data. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2023;30(2):281–289. doi:10.1111/jep.13945

240.

Vickers AJ, Calster B van, Steyerberg EW. A simple, step-by-step guide to interpreting decision curve analysis. Diagnostic and Prognostic Research. 2019;3(1). doi:10.1186/s41512-019-0064-7

241.

Pearl J. The Causal Foundations of Structural Equation Modeling. Defense Technical Information Center; 2012. doi:10.21236/ada557445

242.

AALEN OO, FRIGESSI A. What can Statistics Contribute to a Causal Understanding? Scandinavian Journal of Statistics. 2007;34(1):155–168. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9469.2006.00549.x

243.

Matute H, Blanco F, Yarritu I, Díaz-Lago M, Vadillo MA, Barberia I. Illusions of causality: how they bias our everyday thinking and how they could be reduced. Frontiers in Psychology. 2015;6. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00888

244.

Vickers AJ, Assel M, Dunn RL, et al. Guidelines for Reporting Observational Research in Urology: The Importance of Clear Reference to Causality. European Urology. 2023;84(2):147–151. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.027

245.

Hill AB. The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation? Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine. 1965;58(5):295–300. doi:10.1177/003591576505800503

246.

Rothman KJ, Greenland S. H ill’s Criteria for Causality. Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. fevereiro 2005. doi:10.1002/0470011815.b2a03072

247.

Shimonovich M, Pearce A, Thomson H, Keyes K, Katikireddi SV. Assessing causality in epidemiology: revisiting Bradford Hill to incorporate developments in causal thinking. European Journal of Epidemiology. 2020;36(9):873–887. doi:10.1007/s10654-020-00703-7

248.

Textor J, Zander B van der, Gilthorpe MS, Liskiewicz M, Ellison GT. Robust causal inference using directed acyclic graphs: the R package dagitty. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2016;45:1887–1894. doi:10.1093/ije/dyw341

249.

Barrett M. ggdag: Analyze and Create Elegant Directed Acyclic Graphs.; 2024. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggdag.

250.

Lüdecke D, Ben-Shachar MS, Patil I, Waggoner P, Makowski D. performance: An R Package for Assessment, Comparison and Testing of Statistical Models. Journal of Open Source Software. 2021;6:3139. doi:10.21105/joss.03139

251.

Silge J, Robinson D. tidytext: Text Mining and Analysis Using Tidy Data Principles in R. The Journal of Open Source Software. 2016;1. doi:10.21105/joss.00037

252.

Curran-Everett D. Explorations in statistics: hypothesis tests and P values. Advances in Physiology Education. 2009;33(2):81–86. doi:10.1152/advan.90218.2008

253.

Goodman SN. Toward Evidence-Based Medical Statistics. 1: The P Value Fallacy. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1999;130(12):995. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-130-12-199906150-00008

254.

McCaskey K, Rainey C. Substantive Importance and the Veil of Statistical Significance. Statistics, Politics and Policy. 2015;6(1-2). doi:10.1515/spp-2015-0001

255.

Uygun Tunç D, Tunç MN, Lakens D. The epistemic and pragmatic function of dichotomous claims based on statistical hypothesis tests. Theory & Psychology. 2023;33(3):403–423. doi:10.1177/09593543231160112

256.

Vandenbroucke JP, Pearce N. From ideas to studies: how to get ideas and sharpen them into research questions. Clinical Epidemiology. 2018;Volume 10:253–264. doi:10.2147/clep.s142940

257.

Lakens D, Scheel AM, Isager PM. Equivalence Testing for Psychological Research: A Tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. 2018;1(2):259–269. doi:10.1177/2515245918770963

258.

Sullivan GM, Feinn R. Using Effect Sizeor Why the P Value Is Not Enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 2012;4(3):279–282. doi:10.4300/jgme-d-12-00156.1

259.

Neyman J. Outline of a Theory of Statistical Estimation Based on the Classical Theory of Probability. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 1937;236(767):333–380. doi:10.1098/rsta.1937.0005

260.

Goodman SN. Aligning statistical and scientific reasoning. Science. 2016;352(6290):1180–1181. doi:10.1126/science.aaf5406

261.

Cumming G, Fidler F, Vaux DL. Error bars in experimental biology. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2007;177(1):7–11. doi:10.1083/jcb.200611141

262.

Greenland S, Senn SJ, Rothman KJ, et al. Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations. European Journal of Epidemiology. 2016;31(4):337–350. doi:10.1007/s10654-016-0149-3

263.

Cumming G, Finch S. Inference by Eye: Confidence Intervals and How to Read Pictures of Data. American Psychologist. 2005;60(2):170–180. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.60.2.170

264.

Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper: Statistics for the non-statistician. II: ̈Significanẗ relations and their pitfalls. BMJ. 1997;315(7105):422–425. doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7105.422

265.

Weintraub PG. The Importance of Publishing Negative Results. Journal of Insect Science. 2016;16(1):109. doi:10.1093/jisesa/iew092

266.

Altman DG, Bland JM. Statistics notes: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. BMJ. 1995;311(7003):485–485. doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7003.485

267.

Gelman A, Carlin J. Beyond Power Calculations. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2014;9(6):641–651. doi:10.1177/1745691614551642

268.

Lu J, Qiu Y, Deng A. A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 2018;72(1):1–17. doi:10.1111/bmsp.12132

269.

Greenland S. Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis. American Journal of Public Health. 1989;79(3):340–349. doi:10.2105/ajph.79.3.340

270.

Rochon J, Gondan M, Kieser M. To test or not to test: Preliminary assessment of normality when comparing two independent samples. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2012;12(1). doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-81

271.

Wasserstein RL, Lazar NA. The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician. 2016;70(2):129–133. doi:10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108

272.

Altman N, Krzywinski M. P values and the search for significance. Nature Methods. 2017;14(1):3–4. doi:10.1038/nmeth.4120

273.

LATTER OH. THE EGG OF CUCULUS CANORUS: AN ENQUIRY INTO THE DIMENSIONS OF THE CUCKOO’S EGO AND THE RELATION OF THE VARIATIONS TO THE SIZE OF THE EGGS OF THE FOSTER-PARENT, WITH NOTES ON COLORATION, &c. Biometrika. 1902;1(2):164–176. doi:10.1093/biomet/1.2.164

274.

Aylmer Fisher R. The arrangement of field experiments. Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries. 1926. doi:10.23637/ROTHAMSTED.8V61Q

275.

Heinze G, Dunkler D. Five myths about variable selection. Transplant International. 2016;30(1):6–10. doi:10.1111/tri.12895

276.

Zhu M. The rule of three, proof by contradiction, and uncertainty. Math Horizons. 2026;33(3):16–20. doi:10.1080/10724117.2025.2580363

277.

Lakens D, Caldwell A. Simulation-Based Power Analysis for Factorial Analysis of Variance Designs. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. 2021;4:251524592095150. doi:10.1177/2515245920951503

278.

Blume JD, D’Agostino McGowan L, Dupont WD, Greevy RA. Second-generation p-values: Improved rigor, reproducibility, & transparency in statistical analyses. Smalheiser NR, org. PLOS ONE. 2018;13(3):e0188299. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0188299

279.

Lakens D, Delacre M. Equivalence Testing and the Second Generation P-Value. Meta-Psychology. 2020;4. doi:10.15626/mp.2018.933

280.

Kim HY. Statistical notes for clinical researchers: effect size. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics. 2015;40(4):328. doi:10.5395/rde.2015.40.4.328

281.

Aragon TJ. epitools: Epidemiology Tools.; 2020. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.epitools

282.

Ben-Shachar MS, Lüdecke D, Makowski D. effectsize: Estimation of Effect Size Indices and Standardized Parameters. Journal of Open Source Software. 2020;5:2815. doi:10.21105/joss.02815

283.

Champely S. pwr: Basic Functions for Power Analysis.; 2020. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pwr.

284.

GREENLAND S, SCHLESSELMAN JJ, CRIQUI MH. THE FALLACY OF EMPLOYING STANDARDIZED REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS AND CORRELATIONS AS MEASURES OF EFFECT. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1986;123(2):203–208. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114229

285.

Greenland S, Maclure M, Schlesselman JJ, Poole C, Morgenstern H. Standardized Regression Coefficients. Epidemiology. 1991;2(5):387–392. doi:10.1097/00001648-199109000-00015

286.

Breznau N, Rinke EM, Wuttke A, et al. Observing many researchers using the same data and hypothesis reveals a hidden universe of uncertainty. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2022;(44):e2203150119. doi:10.1073/pnas.2203150119

287.

Dwivedi AK, Shukla R. Evidence-based statistical analysis and methods in biomedical research (SAMBR) checklists according to design features. CANCER REPORTS. 2019;3(4). doi:10.1002/cnr2.1211

288.

Dwivedi AK. How to Write Statistical Analysis Section in Medical Research. Journal of Investigative Medicine. 2022;70(8):1759–1770. doi:10.1136/jim-2022-002479

289.

Kim N, Fischer AH, Dyring-Andersen B, Rosner B, Okoye GA. Research Techniques Made Simple: Choosing Appropriate Statistical Methods for Clinical Research. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2017;137(10):e173–e178. doi:10.1016/j.jid.2017.08.007

290.

Marusteri M, Bacarea V. Comparing groups for statistical differences: how to choose the right statistical test? Biochemia Medica. 2010:15–32. doi:10.11613/bm.2010.004

291.

Mishra P, Pandey C, Singh U, Keshri A, Sabaretnam M. Selection of appropriate statistical methods for data analysis. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia. 2019;22(3):297. doi:10.4103/aca.aca_248_18

292.

Ray A, Najmi A, Sadasivam B. How to choose and interpret a statistical test? An update for budding researchers. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2021;10(8):2763. doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_433_21

293.

Nayak B, Hazra A. How to choose the right statistical test? Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2011;59(2):85. doi:10.4103/0301-4738.77005

294.

Shankar S, Singh R. Demystifying statistics: How to choose a statistical test? Indian Journal of Rheumatology. 2014;9(2):77–81. doi:10.1016/j.injr.2014.04.002

295.

Meyer F, Perrier V. esquisse: Explore and Visualize Your Data Interactively.; 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=esquisse.

296.

McHugh ML. The Chi-square test of independence. Biochemia Medica. 2013:143–149. doi:10.11613/bm.2013.018

297.

Kim HY. Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact test. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics. 2017;42(2):152. doi:10.5395/rde.2017.42.2.152

298.

Khamis H. Measures of Association: How to Choose? Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography. 2008;24(3):155–162. doi:10.1177/8756479308317006

299.

Allison JS, Santana L, (Jaco) Visagie IJH. A primer on simple measures of association taught at undergraduate level. Teaching Statistics. 2022;44(3):96–103. doi:10.1111/test.12307

300.

Makowski D, Wiernik BM, Patil I, Lüdecke D, Ben-Shachar MS. correlation: Methods for Correlation Analysis.; 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=correlation.

301.

Lüdecke D, Ben-Shachar MS, Patil I, et al. easystats: Framework for Easy Statistical Modeling, Visualization, and Reporting.; 2022. https://easystats.github.io/easystats/.

302.

Dahlke JA, Wiernik BM. psychmeta: An R Package for Psychometric Meta-Analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement. 2018;43(3):415–416. doi:10.1177/0146621618795933

303.

Wei T, Simko V. R package corrplot: Visualization of a Correlation Matrix.; 2024. https://github.com/taiyun/corrplot.

304.

Mathews I, Pearson K. I. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. VII. On the correlation of characters not quantitatively measurable. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character. 1901;195(262-273):1–47. doi:10.1098/rsta.1900.0022

305.

Banerjee M, Capozzoli M, McSweeney L, Sinha D. Beyond kappa: A review of interrater agreement measures. Canadian Journal of Statistics. 1999;27(1):3–23. doi:10.2307/3315487

306.

William Revelle. psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych.

307.

Leme DE da C, Alves EV da C, Lemos V do CO, Fattori A. NETWORK ANALYSIS: A MULTIVARIATE STATISTICAL APPROACH FOR HEALTH SCIENCE RESEARCH. Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging. 2020;14(1):43–51. doi:10.5327/z2447-212320201900073

308.

Fruchterman TMJ, Reingold EM. Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software: Practice and Experience. 1991;21(11):1129–1164. doi:10.1002/spe.4380211102

309.

Csárdi G, Nepusz T. The igraph software package for complex network research. Vol Complex Systems.; 2006:1695. https://igraph.org.

310.

Epskamp S, Borsboom D, Fried EI. Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy: A Tutorial Paper. Vol 50.; 2018.

311.

Haslbeck JMB, Waldorp LJ. mgm: Estimating Time-Varying Mixed Graphical Models in High-Dimensional Data. Vol 93.; 2020. doi:10.18637/jss.v093.i08

312.

Bandoli G, Palmsten K, Chambers CD, Jelliffe-Pawlowski LL, Baer RJ, Thompson CA. Revisiting the Table 2 fallacy: A motivating example examining preeclampsia and preterm birth. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. 2018;32(4):390–397. doi:10.1111/ppe.12474

313.

Arel-Bundock V. modelsummary: Data and Model Summaries in R. Journal of Statistical Software. 2022;103. doi:10.18637/jss.v103.i01

314.

Sjoberg DD, Whiting K, Curry M, Lavery JA, Larmarange J. Reproducible Summary Tables with the gtsummary Package. The R Journal. 2021;13:570–580. doi:10.32614/RJ-2021-053

315.

Hidalgo B, Goodman M. Multivariate or Multivariable Regression? American Journal of Public Health. 2013;103(1):39–40. doi:10.2105/ajph.2012.300897

316.

Fernandes AAT, Figueiredo Filho DB, Rocha EC da, Nascimento W da S. Read this paper if you want to learn logistic regression. Revista de Sociologia e Política. 2020;28(74). doi:10.1590/1678-987320287406en

317.

Suits DB. Use of Dummy Variables in Regression Equations. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1957;52(280):548–551. doi:10.1080/01621459.1957.10501412

318.

Healy MJ. Statistics from the inside. 16. Multiple regression (2). Archives of Disease in Childhood. 1995;73(3):270–274. doi:10.1136/adc.73.3.270

319.

Kaplan J. fastDummies: Fast Creation of Dummy (Binary) Columns and Rows from Categorical Variables.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=fastDummies.

320.

Kim JH. Multicollinearity and misleading statistical results. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. 2019;72(6):558–569. doi:10.4097/kja.19087

321.

Schloerke B, Cook D, Larmarange J, et al. GGally: Extension to ggplot2.; 2024. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.GGally

322.

Sun GW, Shook TL, Kay GL. Inappropriate use of bivariable analysis to screen risk factors for use in multivariable analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1996;49(8):907–916. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(96)00025-x

323.

Fox J, Weisberg S. An R Companion to Applied Regression. Sage Publications, Inc.; 2019. https://www.john-fox.ca/Companion/.

324.

DALES LG, URY HK. An Improper Use of Statistical Significance Testing in Studying Covariables. International Journal of Epidemiology. 1978;7(4):373–376. doi:10.1093/ije/7.4.373

325.

Lindsey C, Sheather S. Variable Selection in Linear Regression. The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata. 2011;10(4):650–669. doi:10.1177/1536867x1001000407

326.

Miller TL based on F code by A. leaps: Regression Subset Selection.; 2024. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.leaps

327.

Hebbali A. olsrr: Tools for Building OLS Regression Models.; 2024. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.olsrr

328.

Box GEP. Science and Statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1976;71(356):791–799. doi:10.1080/01621459.1976.10480949

329.

Anderson D, Heiss A, Sumners J. equatiomatic: Transform Models into LaTeX Equations.; 2024. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=equatiomatic.

330.

Ploeg T van der, Austin PC, Steyerberg EW. Modern modelling techniques are data hungry: a simulation study for predicting dichotomous endpoints. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2014;14(1). doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-137

331.

HÄGGSTRÖM O. Problem Solving is Often a Matter of Cooking Up an Appropriate Markov Chain*. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics. 2007;34(4):768–780. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9469.2007.00561.x

332.

Spedicato GA. Discrete Time Markov Chains with R. The R Journal. 2017;9(2):84–104. doi:10.32614/RJ-2017-036

333.

Bours MJL. Using mediators to understand effect modification and interaction. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. setembro 2023. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.09.005

334.

Altman DG, Matthews JNS. Statistics Notes: Interaction 1: heterogeneity of effects. BMJ. 1996;313(7055):486–486. doi:10.1136/bmj.313.7055.486

335.

Pinheiro J, Bates D, R Core Team. nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme.

336.

Sabanes Bove D, Dedic J, Kelkhoff D, et al. mmrm: Mixed Models for Repeated Measures.; 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mmrm.

337.

Lenth RV. emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans.

338.

Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderatormediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;51(6):1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

339.

Henderson T. correctR: Corrected Test Statistics for Comparing Machine Learning Models on Correlated Samples.; 2025. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=correctR.

340.

Fan Y, Chen J, Shirkey G, et al. Applications of structural equation modeling (SEM) in ecological studies: an updated review. Ecological Processes. 2016;5(1). doi:10.1186/s13717-016-0063-3

341.

Revelle W. The seductive beauty of latent variable models: Or why I don’t believe in the Easter Bunny. Personality and Individual Differences. 2024;221:112552. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2024.112552

342.

Legate AE, Ringle CM, Hair JF. PLS-SEM: A method demonstration in the R statistical environment. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 2023;35(4):501–529. doi:10.1002/hrdq.21517

343.

Rosseel Y, Jorgensen TD, De Wilde L. lavaan: Latent Variable Analysis.; 2025. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.lavaan

344.

Diego J. Pedregal. UComp: Automatic Univariate Time Series Modelling of many Kinds.; 2025. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.UComp

345.

Pebesma E, Bivand R. Spatial Data Science: With applications in R. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; 2023. doi:10.1201/9780429459016

346.

Cheng J, Schloerke B, Karambelkar B, Xie Y, Aden-Buie G. leaflet: Create Interactive Web Maps with the JavaScript ’Leaflet’ Library.; 2025. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.leaflet

347.

In J, Lee DK. Survival analysis: Part I analysis of time-to-event. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. 2018;71(3):182–191. doi:10.4097/kja.d.18.00067

348.

Hanada K, Moriya J, Kojima M. Comparison of baseline covariate adjustment methods for restricted mean survival time. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 2024;138:107440. doi:10.1016/j.cct.2024.107440

349.

Therneau TM. A Package for Survival Analysis in R.; 2024. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival.

350.

Kassambara A, Kosinski M, Biecek P. survminer: Drawing Survival Curves using ’ggplot2’.; 2025. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.survminer

351.

Burger T. Keeping generative artificial intelligence reliable in omics biology. Patterns. 2026;7(1):101417. doi:10.1016/j.patter.2025.101417

352.

Korkmaz S, Goksuluk D, Karaismailoglu E. fastml: Guarded Resampling Workflows for Safe and Automated Machine Learning in R.; 2026. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.fastml

353.

Bzdok D, Krzywinski M, Altman N. Machine learning: supervised methods. Nature Methods. 2018;15(1):5–6. doi:10.1038/nmeth.4551

354.

Hand DJ. Classifier Technology and the Illusion of Progress. Statistical Science. 2006;21(1). doi:10.1214/088342306000000060

355.

Sidey-Gibbons JAM, Sidey-Gibbons CJ. Machine learning in medicine: a practical introduction. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2019;19(1). doi:10.1186/s12874-019-0681-4

356.

Andaur Navarro CL, Damen JAA, Smeden M van, et al. Systematic review identifies the design and methodological conduct of studies on machine learning-based prediction models. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2023;154:8–22. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.11.015

357.

Lever J, Krzywinski M, Altman N. Logistic regression. Nature Methods. 2016;13(7):541–542. doi:10.1038/nmeth.3904

358.

Krzywinski M, Altman N. Classification and regression trees. Nature Methods. 2017;14(8):757–758. doi:10.1038/nmeth.4370

359.

Fryda T, LeDell E, Gill N, et al. h2o: R Interface for the ’H2O’ Scalable Machine Learning Platform.; 2024. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.h2o

360.

Schubert E. Stop using the elbow criterion for k-means and how to choose the number of clusters instead. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter. 2023;25(1):36–42. doi:10.1145/3606274.3606278

361.

Dyer EL, Kording K. Why the simplest explanation isn’t always the best. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2023;120(52). doi:10.1073/pnas.2319169120

362.

Van Calster B, Collins GS, Vickers AJ, et al. Evaluation of performance measures in predictive artificial intelligence models to support medical decisions: overview and guidance. The Lancet Digital Health. 2025;7(12):100916. doi:10.1016/j.landig.2025.100916

363.

Assel M, Vickers A. The F score ranks diagnostic tests and prediction models inconsistently with their clinical utility. Diagnostic and Prognostic Research. 2025;9(1). doi:10.1186/s41512-025-00214-7

364.

Hicks SA, Strümke I, Thambawita V, et al. On evaluation metrics for medical applications of artificial intelligence. Scientific Reports. 2022;12(1). doi:10.1038/s41598-022-09954-8

365.

Megahed FM, Chen YJ, Jones-Farmer LA, Rigdon SE, Krzywinski M, Altman N. Comparing classifier performance with baselines. Nature Methods. 2024;21(4):546–548. doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02234-5

366.

Carriero A, Luijken K, Hond A de, Moons KGM, Calster B van, Smeden M van. The Harms of Class Imbalance Corrections for Machine Learning Based Prediction Models: A Simulation Study. Statistics in Medicine. 2025;44(3-4). doi:10.1002/sim.10320

367.

McCulloch WS, Pitts W. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics. 1943;5(4):115–133. doi:10.1007/bf02478259

368.

Rosenblatt F. The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychological Review. 1958;65(6):386–408. doi:10.1037/h0042519

369.

Rosenblatt F. Perceptron Simulation Experiments. Proceedings of the IRE. 1960;48(3):301–309. doi:10.1109/jrproc.1960.287598

370.

Fritsch S, Guenther F, Wright MN. neuralnet: Training of Neural Networks.; 2019. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.neuralnet

371.

Ali S, Abuhmed T, El-Sappagh S, et al. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): What we know and what is left to attain Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence. Information Fusion. 2023;99:101805. doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101805

372.

Adadi A, Berrada M. Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access. 2018;6:52138–52160. doi:10.1109/access.2018.2870052

373.

Vilone G, Longo L. Notions of explainability and evaluation approaches for explainable artificial intelligence. Information Fusion. 2021;76:89–106. doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.05.009

374.

Heckman MG, Davis JM, Crowson CS. Post Hoc Power Calculations: An Inappropriate Method for Interpreting the Findings of a Research Study. The Journal of Rheumatology. 2022;49(8):867–870. doi:10.3899/jrheum.211115

375.

Iddi S, Donohue MC. Power and Sample Size for Longitudinal Models in R – The longpower Package and Shiny App. The R Journal. 2022;14:264–282.

376.

Baranger DAA, Finsaas MC, Goldstein BL, Vize CE, Lynam DR, Olino TM. Tutorial: Power Analyses for Interaction Effects in Cross-Sectional Regressions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. 2023;6(3):25152459231187531. doi:10.1177/25152459231187531

377.

Hoenig JM, Heisey DM. The Abuse of Power. The American Statistician. 2001;55(1):19–24. doi:10.1198/000313001300339897

378.

Shibasaki WM, Martins RP. Simple randomization may lead to unequal group sizes. Is that a problem? American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2018;154(4):600–605. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.07.005

379.

Perugini M, Gallucci M, Costantini G. Safeguard Power as a Protection Against Imprecise Power Estimates. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2014;9(3):319–332. doi:10.1177/1745691614528519

380.

Rodríguez del Águila M, González-Ramírez A. Sample size calculation. Allergologia et Immunopathologia. 2014;42(5):485–492. doi:10.1016/j.aller.2013.03.008

381.

Bacchetti P. Ethics and Sample Size. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2005;161(2):105–110. doi:10.1093/aje/kwi014

382.

Ahmed SK. Sample size for saturation in qualitative research: Debates, definitions, and strategies. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health. 2025;5:100171. doi:10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100171

383.

Hennink M, Kaiser BN. Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine. 2022;292:114523. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523

384.

Wutich A, Beresford M, Bernard HR. Sample Sizes for 10 Types of Qualitative Data Analysis: An Integrative Review, Empirical Guidance, and Next Steps. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2024;23. doi:10.1177/16094069241296206

385.

Vasileiou K, Barnett J, Thorpe S, Young T. Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2018;18(1). doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7

386.

Ying X, Robinson KA, Ehrhardt S. Re-evaluating the role of pilot trials in informing effect and sample size estimates for full-scale trials: a meta-epidemiological study. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine. 2023;28(6):383–391. doi:10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112358

387.

Andrade C. Sample Size and its Importance in Research. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine. 2020;42(1):102–103. doi:10.4103/ijpsym.ijpsym_504_19

388.

Lundberg I, Johnson R, Stewart BM. What Is Your Estimand? Defining the Target Quantity Connects Statistical Evidence to Theory. American Sociological Review. 2021;86(3):532–565. doi:10.1177/00031224211004187

389.

Hochman B, Nahas FX, Oliveira Filho RS de, Ferreira LM. Desenhos de pesquisa. Acta Cirurgica Brasileira. 2005;20(suppl 2):2–9. doi:10.1590/s0102-86502005000800002

390.

Mathieu E. Research Note: Blinding: what, why, when and how? Journal of Physiotherapy. 2020;66(1):61–63. doi:10.1016/j.jphys.2019.11.017

391.

Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes: Matching. BMJ. 1994;309(6962):1128–1128. doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6962.1128

392.

Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal. 2009;26(2):91–108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

393.

Sut N. Study Designs in Medicine. Balkan Medical Journal. 2015;31(4):273–277. doi:10.5152/balkanmedj.2014.1408

394.

Souza AC de, Alexandre NMC, Guirardello E de B, Souza AC de, Alexandre NMC, Guirardello E de B. Propriedades psicométricas na avaliação de instrumentos: avaliação da confiabilidade e da validade. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde. 2017;26(3):649–659. doi:10.5123/s1679-49742017000300022

395.

Reeves BC, Wells GA, Waddington H. Quasi-experimental study designs seriespaper 5: a checklist for classifying studies evaluating the effects on health interventionsa taxonomy without labels. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2017;89:30–42. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.02.016

396.

Echevarría-Guanilo ME, Gonçalves N, Romanoski PJ. PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS: CONCEPTUAL BASIS AND EVALUATION METHODS – PART II. Texto & Contexto – Enfermagem. 2019;28. doi:10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2017-0311

397.

Chassé M, Fergusson DA. Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine. 2019;49(2):87–93. doi:10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2018.11.005

398.

Chidambaram AG, Josephson M. Clinical research study designs: The essentials. PEDIATRIC INVESTIGATION. 2019;3(4):245–252. doi:10.1002/ped4.12166

399.

Erdemir A, Mulugeta L, Ku JP, et al. Credible practice of modeling and simulation in healthcare: ten rules from a multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2020;18(1). doi:10.1186/s12967-020-02540-4

400.

Yang B, Olsen M, Vali Y, et al. Study designs for comparative diagnostic test accuracy: A methodological review and classification scheme. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2021;138:128–138. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.04.013

401.

Chipman H, Bingham D. Let’s practice what we preach: Planning and interpreting simulation studies with design and analysis of experiments. Canadian Journal of Statistics. 2022;50(4):1228–1249. doi:10.1002/cjs.11719

402.

Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research. 2021;133:285–296. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

403.

Lim WM, Kumar S. Guidelines for interpreting the results of bibliometric analysis: A sensemaking approach. Global Business and Organizational Excellence. agosto 2023. doi:10.1002/joe.22229

404.

Morris TP, White IR, Crowther MJ. Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods. Statistics in Medicine. 2019;38(11):2074–2102. doi:10.1002/sim.8086

405.

Boulesteix AL, Groenwold RH, Abrahamowicz M, et al. Introduction to statistical simulations in health research. BMJ Open. 2020;10(12):e039921. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039921

406.

Erdemir A, Mulugeta L, Ku JP, et al. Credible practice of modeling and simulation in healthcare: ten rules from a multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2020;18(1). doi:10.1186/s12967-020-02540-4

407.

Trisovic A, Lau MK, Pasquier T, Crosas M. A large-scale study on research code quality and execution. Scientific Data. 2022;9(1). doi:10.1038/s41597-022-01143-6

408.

Metropolis N, Ulam S. The Monte Carlo Method. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1949;44(247):335–341. doi:10.1080/01621459.1949.10483310

409.

Goldfeld K, Wujciak-Jens J. simstudy: Illuminating research methods through data generation. Journal of Open Source Software. 2020;5:2763. doi:10.21105/joss.02763

410.

DeBruine L. faux: Simulation for Factorial Designs.; 2023. doi:10.5281/zenodo.2669586

411.

White IR, Pham TM, Quartagno M, Morris TP. How to check a simulation study. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2023;53(1). doi:10.1093/ije/dyad134

412.

Gasparini A. rsimsum: Summarise results from Monte Carlo simulation studies. Vol 3.; 2018:739. doi:10.21105/joss.00739

413.

Monks T, Currie CSM, Onggo BS, Robinson S, Kunc M, Taylor SJE. Strengthening the reporting of empirical simulation studies: Introducing the STRESS guidelines. Journal of Simulation. 2018;13(1):55–67. doi:10.1080/17477778.2018.1442155

414.

Elm E von, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2007;147(8):573. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010

415.

Scott WA. Reliability of Content Analysis: The Case of Nominal Scale Coding. Public Opinion Quarterly. 1955;19(3):321. doi:10.1086/266577

416.

Cohen J. A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1960;20(1):37–46. doi:10.1177/001316446002000104

417.

Gamer M, Lemon J, Ian Fellows Puspendra Singh. irr: Various Coefficients of Interrater Reliability and Agreement.; 2019. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.irr

418.

Lehnert B. BlandAltmanLeh: Plots (Slightly Extended) Bland-Altman Plots.; 2015. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=BlandAltmanLeh.

419.

Contributors semTools. semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling.; 2016. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools.

420.

Quartagno M, Carpenter J. jomo: A package for Multilevel Joint Modelling Multiple Imputation.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=jomo.

421.

Kottner J, Audigé L, Brorson S, et al. Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2011;64(1):96–106. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002

422.

Rosseel Y. lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software. 2012;48. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02

423.

Findley MG, Kikuta K, Denly M. External Validity. Annual Review of Political Science. 2021;24(1):365–393. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102556

424.

Westreich D, Greenland S. The Table 2 Fallacy: Presenting and Interpreting Confounder and Modifier Coefficients. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2013;177(4):292–298. doi:10.1093/aje/kws412

425.

Gagnier JJ, Lai J, Mokkink LB, Terwee CB. COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research. 2021;30(8):2197–2218. doi:10.1007/s11136-021-02822-4

426.

Streiner DL, Kottner J. Recommendations for reporting the results of studies of instrument and scale development and testing. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2014;70(9):1970–1979. doi:10.1111/jan.12402

427.

Steckelberg A, Balgenorth A, Berger J, Mühlhauser I. Explaining computation of predictive values: 2 × 2 table versus frequency tree. A randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN74278823]. BMC Medical Education. 2004;4(1). doi:10.1186/1472-6920-4-13

428.

Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper: Papers that report diagnostic or screening tests. BMJ. 1997;315(7107):540–543. doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7107.540

429.

Neth H, Gaisbauer F, Gradwohl N, Gaissmaier W. riskyr: Rendering Risk Literacy more Transparent.; 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=riskyr.

430.

Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH, Bonsel GJ, Bossuyt PMM. The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2003;56(11):1129–1135. doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00177-x

431.

Kuhn, Max. Building Predictive Models in R Using the caret Package. Journal of Statistical Software. 2008;28(5):1–26. doi:10.18637/jss.v028.i05

432.

Xu J, Zhang Y, Miao D. Three-way confusion matrix for classification: A measure driven view. Information Sciences. 2020;507:772–794. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2019.06.064

433.

He Z, Zhang Q, Song M, Tan X, Wang W. Four overlooked errors in ROC analysis: how to prevent and avoid. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine. 2024;30(3):208–211. doi:10.1136/bmjebm-2024-113078

434.

Park SH, Goo JM, Jo CH. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve: Practical Review for Radiologists. Korean Journal of Radiology. 2004;5(1):11. doi:10.3348/kjr.2004.5.1.11

435.

Park SH, Goo JM, Jo CH. UniODA vs ROC Analysis: Computing the “optimal” cut-point. Optimal Data Analysis. 2014;3(14):117–120. https://odajournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/v3a29.pdf.

436.

Hond AAH de, Steyerberg EW, Calster B van. Interpreting area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The Lancet Digital Health. 2022;4(12):e853–e855. doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(22)00188-1

437.

Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, et al. pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:77. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-77

438.

Ferreira ADS, Meziat-Filho N, Ferreira APA. Double threshold receiver operating characteristic plot for three-modal continuous predictors. Computational Statistics. 2021;36(3):2231–2245. doi:10.1007/s00180-021-01080-9

439.

Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ. outubro 2015:h5527. doi:10.1136/bmj.h5527

440.

Senn S. The analysis of continuous data from n-of-1 trials using paired cycles: a simple tutorial. Trials. 2024;25(1). doi:10.1186/s13063-024-07964-7

441.

Chatters R, Hawksworth O, Julious S, Cook A. The development of a set of key points to aid clinicians and researchers in designing and conducting n-of-1 trials. Trials. 2024;25(1). doi:10.1186/s13063-024-08261-z

442.

Hawksworth O, Chatters R, Julious S, et al. A methodological review of randomised n-of-1 trials. Trials. 2024;25(1). doi:10.1186/s13063-024-08100-1

443.

Sarkar D. Lattice: Multivariate Data Visualization with R.; 2008. http://lmdvr.r-forge.r-project.org.

444.

Wellek S, Blettner M. On the Proper Use of the Crossover Design in Clinical Trials. Deutsches Ärzteblatt international. abril 2012. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2012.0276

445.

Rosenkranz GK. Analysis of cross-over studies with missing data. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. 2014;24(4):420–433. doi:10.1177/0962280214521349

446.

Dwan K, Li T, Altman DG, Elbourne D. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised crossover trials. BMJ. julho 2019:l4378. doi:10.1136/bmj.l4378

447.

Reeves BC, Gaus W. Guidelines for Reporting Non-Randomised Studies. Complementary Medicine Research. 2004;11(1):46–52. doi:10.1159/000080576

448.

Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparisons within randomised groups can be very misleading. BMJ. 2011;342(may06 2):d561–d561. doi:10.1136/bmj.d561

449.

Bruce CL, Juszczak E, Ogollah R, Partlett C, Montgomery A. A systematic review of randomisation method use in RCTs and association of trial design characteristics with method selection. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2022;22(1). doi:10.1186/s12874-022-01786-4

450.

Vickers AJ, Altman DG. Statistics Notes: Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements. BMJ. 2001;323(7321):1123–1124. doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1123

451.

O Connell NS, Dai L, Jiang Y, et al. Methods for Analysis of Pre-Post Data in Clinical Research: A Comparison of Five Common Methods. Journal of Biometrics & Biostatistics. 2017;08(01). doi:10.4172/2155-6180.1000334

452.

Laird N. Further Comparative Analyses of Pretest-Posttest Research Designs. The American Statistician. 1983;37(4a):329–330. doi:10.1080/00031305.1983.10483133

453.

Cnaan A, Laird NM, Slasor P. Using the general linear mixed model to analyse unbalanced repeated measures and longitudinal data. Statistics in Medicine. 1997;16(20):2349–2380. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19971030)16:20<2349::aid-sim667>3.0.co;2-e

454.

Mallinckrodt CH, Lane PW, Schnell D, Peng Y, Mancuso JP. Recommendations for the Primary Analysis of Continuous Endpoints in Longitudinal Clinical Trials. Drug Information Journal. 2008;42(4):303–319. doi:10.1177/009286150804200402

455.

Assmann SF, Pocock SJ, Enos LE, Kasten LE. Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials. The Lancet. 2000;355(9209):1064–1069. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02039-0

456.

Stang A, Baethge C. Imbalance <em>p</em> values for baseline covariates in randomized controlled trials: a last resort for the use of <em>p</em> values? A pro and contra debate. Clinical Epidemiology. 2018;Volume 10:531–535. doi:10.2147/clep.s161508

457.

Chen H, Lu Y, Slye N. Testing for baseline differences in clinical trials. International Journal of Clinical Trials. 2020;7(2):150. doi:10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20201720

458.

Bolzern JE, Mitchell A, Torgerson DJ. Baseline testing in cluster randomised controlled trials: should this be done? BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2019;19(1). doi:10.1186/s12874-019-0750-8

459.

Lavori PW, Louis TA, Bailar JC, Polansky M. Designs for Experiments Parallel Comparisons of Treatment. New England Journal of Medicine. 1983;309(21):1291–1299. doi:10.1056/nejm198311243092105

460.

Altman DG. Comparability of Randomised Groups. The Statistician. 1985;34(1):125. doi:10.2307/2987510

461.

Altman DG, Doré CJ. Randomisation and baseline comparisons in clinical trials. The Lancet. 1990;335(8682):149–153. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(90)90014-v

462.

Pijls BG. The Table I Fallacy: P Values in Baseline Tables of Randomized Controlled Trials. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2022;104(16):e71. doi:10.2106/jbjs.21.01166

463.

Roberts C, Torgerson DJ. Understanding controlled trials: Baseline imbalance in randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 1999;319(7203):185–185. doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7203.185

464.

Gruijters SLK. Baseline comparisons and covariate fishing: Bad statistical habits we should have broken yesterday. julho 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/qftwg.

465.

Vickers AJ. The use of percentage change from baseline as an outcome in a controlled trial is statistically inefficient: a simulation study. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2001;1(1). doi:10.1186/1471-2288-1-6

466.

Brookes ST, Whitely E, Egger M, Smith GD, Mulheran PA, Peters TJ. Subgroup analyses in randomized trials: risks of subgroup-specific analyses; Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2004;57(3):229–236. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.08.009

467.

Matthews JNS, Altman DG. Statistics Notes: Interaction 2: compare effect sizes not P values. BMJ. 1996;313(7060):808–808. doi:10.1136/bmj.313.7060.808

468.

Altman DG. Statistics Notes: Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates. BMJ. 2003;326(7382):219–219. doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7382.219

469.

Hauck WW, Anderson S, Marcus SM. Should We Adjust for Covariates in Nonlinear Regression Analyses of Randomized Trials? Controlled Clinical Trials. 1998;19(3):249–256. doi:10.1016/s0197-2456(97)00147-5

470.

Kahan BC, Jairath V, Doré CJ, Morris TP. The risks and rewards of covariate adjustment in randomized trials: an assessment of 12 outcomes from 8 studies. Trials. 2014;15(1). doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-139

471.

Cao Y, Allore H, Vander Wyk B, Gutman R. Review and evaluation of imputation methods for multivariate longitudinal data with mixed-type incomplete variables. Statistics in Medicine. outubro 2022. doi:10.1002/sim.9592

472.

Schulz KF. CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2010;152(11):726. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232

473.

Dayim A. consort: Create Consort Diagram.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=consort.

474.

Baker KA, Weeks SM. An Overview of Systematic Review. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing. 2014;29(6):454–458. doi:10.1016/j.jopan.2014.07.002

475.

Fantini D. easyPubMed: Search and Retrieve Scientific Publication Records from PubMed.; 2019. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.easyPubMed

476.

Chamberlain S, Zhu H, Jahn N, Boettiger C, Ram K. rcrossref: Client for Various CrossRef APIs.; 2022. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.rcrossref

477.

Jahn N. roadoi: Find Free Versions of Scholarly Publications via Unpaywall.; 2024. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.roadoi

478.

Silva V, Grande AJ, Martimbianco ALC, Riera R, Carvalho APV. Overview of systematic reviews - a new type of study: part I: why and for whom? Sao Paulo Medical Journal. 2012;130(6):398–404. doi:10.1590/s1516-31802012000600007

479.

Silva V, Grande AJ, Carvalho APV de, Martimbianco ALC, Riera R. Overview of systematic reviews - a new type of study. Part II. Sao Paulo Medical Journal. 2014;133(3):206–217. doi:10.1590/1516-3180.2013.8150015

480.

Stern C, Li J, Stone J, et al. Data analysis and presentation methods in umbrella reviews/overviews of reviews in health care: A cross-sectional study. Research Synthesis Methods. outubro 2025:1–15. doi:10.1017/rsm.2025.10040

481.

Snell KIE, Levis B, Damen JAA, et al. Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA). BMJ. maio 2023:e073538. doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-073538

482.

Moons KGM, Groot JAH de, Bouwmeester W, et al. Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist. PLoS Medicine. 2014;11(10):e1001744. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001744

483.

Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods. 2010;1(2):97–111. doi:10.1002/jrsm.12

484.

Viechtbauer W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Vol 36.; 2010. doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03

485.

Balduzzi S, Rücker G, Nikolakopoulou A, et al. netmeta: An R Package for Network Meta-Analysis Using Frequentist Methods. Journal of Statistical Software. 2023;106(2):1–40. doi:10.18637/jss.v106.i02

486.

Valkenhoef G van, Kuiper J. gemtc: Network Meta-Analysis Using Bayesian Methods.; 2025. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.gemtc

487.

Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2005;5(1). doi:10.1186/1471-2288-5-13

488.

Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2014;14(1). doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-135

489.

Borenstein M. In a meta-analysis, the I-squared statistic does not tell us how much the effect size varies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. outubro 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.10.003

490.

Rücker G, Schwarzer G, Carpenter JR, Schumacher M. Undue reliance on I 2 in assessing heterogeneity may mislead. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2008;8(1). doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-79

491.

Grooth HJ de, Parienti JJ. Heterogeneity between studies can be explained more reliably with individual patient data. Intensive Care Medicine. julho 2023. doi:10.1007/s00134-023-07163-z

492.

Dettori JR, Norvell DC, Chapman JR. Seeing the Forest by Looking at the Trees: How to Interpret a Meta-Analysis Forest Plot. Global Spine Journal. 2021;11(4):614–616. doi:10.1177/21925682211003889

493.

Phillips B, Stewart LA, Sutton AJ. ‘Cross hairs’ plots for diagnostic meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods. 2010;1(3-4):308–315. doi:10.1002/jrsm.26

494.

Sousa-Pinto PD with contributions from B. mada: Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy.; 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mada.

495.

Sterne JAC, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JPA, et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2011;343(jul22 1):d4002–d4002. doi:10.1136/bmj.d4002

496.

Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629–634. doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629

497.

Peters JL. Comparison of Two Methods to Detect Publication Bias in Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2006;295(6):676. doi:10.1001/jama.295.6.676

498.

Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel-PlotBased Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis. Biometrics. 2000;56(2):455–463. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x

499.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLOS Medicine. 2021;18(3):e1003583. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583

500.

Lajeunesse MJ. Facilitating systematic reviews, data extraction, and meta-analysis with the metagear package for R. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2016;7(3):323–330. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12472

501.

Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews. 2015;4(1). doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1

502.

Haddaway NR, Page MJ, Pritchard CC, McGuinness LA. PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 2022;18:e1230. doi:10.1002/cl2.1230

503.

Gates M, Gates A, Pieper D, et al. Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement. BMJ. agosto 2022:e070849. doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-070849

504.

O’Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Drabble SJ, Rudolph A, Hewison J. What can qualitative research do for randomised controlled trials? A systematic mapping review. BMJ Open. 2013;3(6):e002889. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002889

505.

O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research. Academic Medicine. 2014;89(9):1245–1251. doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000000388

506.

Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig J. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2012;12(1). doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-181

507.

Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042

508.

Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Thorpe A, Fagerlin A. How to Communicate Medical Numbers. JAMA. 2025;334(16):1474. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.13655

509.

Green DJ, Smith D, Whittle R. Top 10 statistical pitfalls: a reviewer’s guide to avoiding common errors. Heart. 2025;112(3):139–143. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2025-325939

510.

Makowski D, Lüdecke D, Patil I, Thériault R, Ben-Shachar MS, Wiernik BM. Automated Results Reporting as a Practical Tool to Improve Reproducibility and Methodological Best Practices Adoption.; 2023. https://easystats.github.io/report/.

511.

Nuijten MB, Epskamp S. statcheck: Extract Statistics from Articles and Recompute P-Values.; 2024. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.statcheck

512.

Wallisch C, Bach P, Hafermann L, et al. Review of guidance papers on regression modeling in statistical series of medical journals. Mathes T, org. PLOS ONE. 2022;17(1):e0262918. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0262918

513.

Lynggaard H, Bell J, Lösch C, et al. Principles and recommendations for incorporating estimands into clinical study protocol templates. Trials. 2022;23(1). doi:10.1186/s13063-022-06515-2

514.

Althouse AD, Below JE, Claggett BL, et al. Recommendations for Statistical Reporting in Cardiovascular Medicine: A Special Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;144(4). doi:10.1161/circulationaha.121.055393

515.

Lee KJ, Tilling KM, Cornish RP, et al. Framework for the treatment and reporting of missing data in observational studies: The Treatment And Reporting of Missing data in Observational Studies framework. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2021;134:79–88. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.008

516.

Vickers AJ, Assel MJ, Sjoberg DD, et al. Guidelines for Reporting of Figures and Tables for Clinical Research in Urology. Urology. 2020;142:1–13. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2020.05.002

517.

Hayes-Larson E, Kezios KL, Mooney SJ, Lovasi G. Who is in this study, anyway? Guidelines for a useful Table 1. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2019;114:125–132. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.06.011

518.

Assel M, Sjoberg D, Elders A, et al. Guidelines for Reporting of Statistics for Clinical Research in Urology. Journal of Urology. 2019;201(3):595–604. doi:10.1097/ju.0000000000000001

519.

Lang TA, Altman DG. Basic statistical reporting for articles published in Biomedical Journals: The “Statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature” or the SAMPL Guidelines. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2015;52(1):5–9. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.09.006

520.

Weissgerber TL, Milic NM, Winham SJ, Garovic VD. Beyond Bar and Line Graphs: Time for a New Data Presentation Paradigm. PLOS Biology. 2015;13(4):e1002128. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002128

521.

Sauerbrei W, Abrahamowicz M, Altman DG, Cessie S, Carpenter J. STRengthening Analytical Thinking for Observational Studies: the STRATOS initiative. Statistics in Medicine. 2014;33(30):5413–5432. doi:10.1002/sim.6265

522.

Groves T. Research methods and reporting. BMJ. 2008;337(oct22 1):a2201–a2201. doi:10.1136/bmj.a2201

523.

Stratton IM, Neil A. How to ensure your paper is rejected by the statistical reviewer. Diabetic Medicine. 2005;22(4):371–373. doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01443.x

524.

Mansournia MA, Collins GS, Nielsen RO, et al. A CHecklist for statistical Assessment of Medical Papers (the CHAMP statement): explanation and elaboration. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2021;55(18):1009–1017. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2020-103652

525.

Gil-Sierra MD, Fénix-Caballero S, Abdel kader-Martin L, et al. Checklist for clinical applicability of subgroup analysis. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics. 2019;45(3):530–538. doi:10.1111/jcpt.13102

526.

Inskip H, Ntani G, Westbury L, et al. Getting started with tables. Archives of Public Health. 2017;75(1). doi:10.1186/s13690-017-0180-1

527.

Kwak SG, Kang H, Kim JH, et al. The principles of presenting statistical results: Table. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. 2021;74(2):115–119. doi:10.4097/kja.20582

528.

Rich B. table1: Tables of Descriptive Statistics in HTML.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=table1.

529.

Gohel D, Skintzos P. flextable: Functions for Tabular Reporting.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=flextable.

530.

Thériault R. rempsyc: Convenience functions for psychology. Journal of Open Source Software. 2023;8:5466. doi:10.21105/joss.05466

531.

Barnett A. Automated detection of over- and under-dispersion in baseline tables in randomised controlled trials. F1000Research. 2023;11:783. doi:10.12688/f1000research.123002.2

532.

Midway SR. Principles of Effective Data Visualization. Patterns. 2020;1(9):100141. doi:10.1016/j.patter.2020.100141

533.

Park JH, Lee DK, Kang H, et al. The principles of presenting statistical results using figures. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. 2022;75(2):139–150. doi:10.4097/kja.21508

534.

Vandemeulebroecke M, Baillie M, Carr D, et al. How can we make better graphs? An initiative to increase the graphical expertise and productivity of quantitative scientists. Pharmaceutical Statistics. 2018;18(1):106–114. doi:10.1002/pst.1912

535.

Sievert C. Interactive Web-Based Data Visualization with R, plotly, and shiny. Chapman; Hall/CRC; 2020. https://plotly-r.com.

536.

Wise EA, Adams RJ, Lyketsos CG, Leoutsakos JM. Graphical methods for understanding changes in states: Understanding medication use pathways. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research. 2022;31(4). doi:10.1002/mpr.1932

537.

Swihart BJ, Caffo B, James BD, Strand M, Schwartz BS, Punjabi NM. Lasagna Plots. Epidemiology. 2010;21(5):621–625. doi:10.1097/ede.0b013e3181e5b06a

538.

Mercier F, Consalvo N, Frey N, Phipps A, Ribba B. From waterfall plots to spaghetti plots in early oncology clinical development. Pharmaceutical Statistics. 2019;18(5):526–532. doi:10.1002/pst.1944

539.

Xiao N. ggsci: Scientific Journal and Sci-Fi Themed Color Palettes for ggplot2.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggsci.

540.

Urbanek S, Johnson K. tiff: Read and Write TIFF Images.; 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tiff.

541.

Lee H, Cashin AG, Lamb SE, et al. A Guideline for Reporting Mediation Analyses of Randomized Trials and Observational Studies. JAMA. 2021;326(11):1045. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.14075