Referências
1.
Amatuzzi MLL, Barreto M do CC, Litvoc J, Leme LEG. Linguagem metodológica: parte 1. Acta Ortopédica Brasileira. 2006;14(1):53–56. doi:10.1590/s1413-78522006000100012
2.
Amatuzzi MLL, Barreto M do CC, Litvoc J, Leme LEG. Linguagem metodológica: parte 2. Acta Ortopédica Brasileira. 2006;14(2):108–112. doi:10.1590/s1413-78522006000200012
3.
Wood M, Welch C. Are ‘Qualitative’ and ‘Quantitative’ Useful Terms for Describing Research? Methodological Innovations Online. 2010;5(1):56–71. doi:10.4256/mio.2010.0010
4.
Lall D. Mixed-Methods Research. Indian Journal of Continuing Nursing Education. 2021;22(2):143–147. doi:10.4103/ijcn.ijcn_107_21
5.
Sherbino J, Poth CN, Haines K. Research Note: Distinguishing mixed-methods from multi-methods research why integration matters. Journal of Physiotherapy. 2026;72(2):153–155. doi:10.1016/j.jphys.2026.02.001
6.
Sandelowski M. Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Sampling, Data Collection, and Analysis Techniques in Mixed-Method Studies. Research in Nursing & Health. 2000;23(3):246–255. doi:10.1002/1098-240x(200006)23:3<246::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-h
7.
Schoonenboom J, Johnson RB. How to Construct a Mixed Methods Research Design. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. 2017;69(S2):107–131. doi:10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1
8.
Rubin M, Donkin C. Exploratory hypothesis tests can be more compelling than confirmatory hypothesis tests. Philosophical Psychology. 2022;37(8):2019–2047. doi:10.1080/09515089.2022.2113771
9.
Späth C. From best practices to severe testing: A methodological response to Büsch and Loffing (2024). German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research. outubro 2025. doi:10.1007/s12662-025-01072-7
10.
Resnik DB, Shamoo AE. Reproducibility and Research Integrity. Accountability in Research. 2016;24(2):116–123. doi:10.1080/08989621.2016.1257387
11.
Hofner B, Schmid M, Edler L. Reproducible research in statistics: A review and guidelines for the Biometrical Journal. Biometrical Journal. 2015;58(2):416–427. doi:10.1002/bimj.201500156
12.
Mair P. Thou Shalt Be Reproducible! A Technology Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology. 2016;7. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01079
13.
Hinsen K. A data and code model for reproducible research and executable papers. Procedia Computer Science. 2011;4:579–588. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2011.04.061
14.
Gamble C, Krishan A, Stocken D, et al. Guidelines for the Content of Statistical Analysis Plans in Clinical Trials. JAMA. 2017;318(23):2337. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.18556
15.
Kahan BC, Hindley J, Edwards M, Cro S, Morris TP. The estimands framework: a primer on the ICH E9(R1) addendum. BMJ. janeiro 2024:e076316. doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-076316
16.
Banerjee A, Chaudhury S. Statistics without tears: Populations and samples. Industrial Psychiatry Journal. 2010;19(1):60. doi:10.4103/0972-6748.77642
17.
Polit DF, Beck CT. Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: Myths and strategies. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2010;47(11):1451–1458. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.06.004
18.
AALEN OO, FRIGESSI A. What can Statistics Contribute to a Causal Understanding? Scandinavian Journal of Statistics. 2007;34(1):155–168. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9469.2006.00549.x
19.
Matute H, Blanco F, Yarritu I, Díaz-Lago M, Vadillo MA, Barberia I. Illusions of causality: how they bias our everyday thinking and how they could be reduced. Frontiers in Psychology. 2015;6. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00888
20.
Grami A. Discrete Probability. Em: Discrete Mathematics: Essentials and Applications. Elsevier; 2023:285–305. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-820656-0.00016-2
21.
Viti A, Terzi A, Bertolaccini L. A practical overview on probability distributions. Journal of Thoracic Disease. 2015;7(3). https://jtd.amegroups.org/article/view/4086.
22.
Benford F. The Law of Anomalous Numbers. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. 1938;78(4):551–572. http://www.jstor.org/stable/984802. Acesso em novembro 24, 2024.
23.
Hill TP. A Statistical Derivation of the Significant-Digit Law. Statistical Science. 1995;10(4). doi:10.1214/ss/1177009869
24.
Tversky A, Kahneman D. Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin. 1971;76(2):105–110. doi:10.1037/h0031322
25.
Bishop DVM, Thompson J, Parker AJ. Can we shift belief in the ‘Law of Small Numbers’? Royal Society Open Science. 2022;9(3). doi:10.1098/rsos.211028
26.
Guy RK. The Strong Law of Small Numbers. The American Mathematical Monthly. 1988;95(8):697. doi:10.2307/2322249
27.
Guy RK. The Second Strong Law of Small Numbers. Mathematics Magazine. 1990;63(1):3–20. doi:10.1080/0025570x.1990.11977475
28.
Seneta E. A Tricentenary history of the Law of Large Numbers. Bernoulli. 2013;19(4). doi:10.3150/12-bejsp12
29.
Kwak SG, Kim JH. Central limit theorem: the cornerstone of modern statistics. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. 2017;70(2):144. doi:10.4097/kjae.2017.70.2.144
30.
Galton F. Regression Towards Mediocrity in Hereditary Stature. The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. 1886;15:246. doi:10.2307/2841583
31.
Barnett AG. Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2004;34(1):215–220. doi:10.1093/ije/dyh299
32.
Senn S. Francis Galton and Regression to the Mean. Significance. 2011;8(3):124–126. doi:10.1111/j.1740-9713.2011.00509.x
33.
Recchia D. regtomean: Regression Toward the Mean.; 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=regtomean.
34.
Gal I. Adults’ Statistical Literacy: Meanings, Components, Responsibilities. International Statistical Review. 2002;70(1):1–25. doi:10.1111/j.1751-5823.2002.tb00336.x
35.
Sharma S. Definitions and models of statistical literacy: a literature review. Open Review of Educational Research. 2017;4(1):118–133. doi:10.1080/23265507.2017.1354313
36.
Hidayati NA, Waluya SB, Rochmad, Wardono. Statistics literacy: what, why and how? Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2020;1613(1):012080. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1613/1/012080
37.
Shields M. Information Literacy, Statistical Literacy, Data Literacy. IASSIST Quarterly. 2005;28(2):6. doi:10.29173/iq790
38.
Indrayan A. Statistical fallacies & errors can also jeopardize life & health of many. Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2018;148(6):677–679. doi:10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_853_18
39.
GOULD R. DATA LITERACY IS STATISTICAL LITERACY. STATISTICS EDUCATION RESEARCH JOURNAL. 2017;16(1):22–25. doi:10.52041/serj.v16i1.209
40.
CALLINGHAM R, WATSON JM. THE DEVELOPMENT OF STATISTICAL LITERACY AT SCHOOL. STATISTICS EDUCATION RESEARCH JOURNAL. 2017;16(1):181–201. doi:10.52041/serj.v16i1.223
41.
Koga S. Characteristics of statistical literacy skills from the perspective of critical thinking. Teaching Statistics. 2022;44(2):59–67. doi:10.1111/test.12302
42.
Martínez-Mesa J, González-Chica DA, Duquia RP, Bonamigo RR, Bastos JL. Sampling: how to select participants in my research study? Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia. 2016;91(3):326–330. doi:10.1590/abd1806-4841.20165254
43.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics Notes: Bootstrap resampling methods. BMJ. 2015;350(jun02 13):h2622–h2622. doi:10.1136/bmj.h2622
44.
Altman DG, Bland JM. Statistics Notes: Units of analysis. BMJ. 1997;314(7098):1874–1874. doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7098.1874
45.
Matthews JN, Altman DG, Campbell MJ, Royston P. Analysis of serial measurements in medical research. BMJ. 1990;300(6719):230–235. doi:10.1136/bmj.300.6719.230
46.
Ihaka R, Gentleman R. R: A Language for Data Analysis and Graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics. 1996;5(3):299. doi:10.2307/1390807
47.
Nwanganga F, Chapple M. Introduction to R and RStudio. Em: Nwanganga F, Chapple M, org. Practical Machine Learning in R. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2020:25–52. doi:10.1002/9781119591542.ch2
48.
R Core Team. The Comprehensive R Archive Network. 2021. https://cran.r-project.org.
49.
Allaire J, Xie Y, Dervieux C, et al. rmarkdown: Dynamic Documents for R.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rmarkdown.
50.
Holmes DT, Mobini M, McCudden CR. Reproducible manuscript preparation with RMarkdown application to JMSACL and other Elsevier Journals. Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab. 2021;22:8–16. doi:10.1016/j.jmsacl.2021.09.002
51.
Blischak JD, Carbonetto P, Stephens M. Creating and sharing reproducible research code the workflowr way. F1000Research. 2019;8:1749. doi:10.12688/f1000research.20843.1
52.
Love J, Selker R, Marsman M, et al. JASP: Graphical Statistical Software for Common Statistical Designs. Journal of Statistical Software. 2019;88(2). doi:10.18637/jss.v088.i02
53.
ŞAHİN M, AYBEK E. Jamovi: An Easy to Use Statistical Software for the Social Scientists. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education. 2020;6(4):670–692. doi:10.21449/ijate.661803
54.
Selker R, Love J, Dropmann D. jmv: The jamovi Analyses.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=jmv.
55.
Love J. jmvconnect: Connect to the jamovi Statistical Spreadsheet.; 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=jmvconnect.
56.
Racine JS. RStudio: A Platform-Independent IDE for R and Sweave. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 2011;27(1):167–172. doi:10.1002/jae.1278
57.
Aden-Buie G, Schloerke B, Allaire J, Rossell Hayes A. learnr: Interactive Tutorials for R.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=learnr.
58.
Schwab, Simon, Held, Leonhard. Statistical programming: Small mistakes, big impacts. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc. 2021. doi:10.5167/UZH-205154
59.
Eglen SJ, Marwick B, Halchenko YO, et al. Toward standard practices for sharing computer code and programs in neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience. 2017;20(6):770–773. doi:10.1038/nn.4550
60.
Xie Y. formatR: Format R Code Automatically.; 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=formatR.
61.
Müller K, Walthert L. styler: Non-Invasive Pretty Printing of R Code.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=styler.
62.
Hester J, Angly F, Hyde R, et al. lintr: A Linter for R Code.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lintr.
63.
All R CRAN packages [Full List]. 2025. https://r-packages.io/packages. Acesso em fevereiro 11, 2025.
64.
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2023. https://www.R-project.org/.
65.
Wickham H, Danenberg P, Csárdi G, Eugster M. roxygen2: In-Line Documentation for R.; 2024. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.roxygen2
66.
Trisovic A, Lau MK, Pasquier T, Crosas M. A large-scale study on research code quality and execution. Scientific Data. 2022;9(1). doi:10.1038/s41597-022-01143-6
67.
Gohel D, Ross N. officedown: Enhanced R Markdown Format for Word and PowerPoint.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=officedown.
68.
Xie Y. bookdown: Authoring Books and Technical Documents with R Markdown. Chapman; Hall/CRC; 2023. https://bookdown.org/yihui/bookdown/.
69.
Ioannidis JPA. How to Make More Published Research True. PLoS Medicine. 2014;11(10):e1001747. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001747
70.
Krieger N, Perzynski A, Dalton J. projects: A Project Infrastructure for Researchers.; 2021. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=projects.
71.
Brun J, Janée G, Curty RG. Ten quick tips for developing a reproducible Shiny application. Ouellette F, org. PLOS Computational Biology. 2025;21(10):e1013551. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013551
72.
Chang W, Cheng J, Allaire J, et al. shiny: Web Application Framework for R.; 2026. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.shiny
73.
Sievert C, Cheng J, Aden-Buie G. bslib: Custom ’Bootstrap’ ’Sass’ Themes for ’shiny’ and ’rmarkdown’.; 2026. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.bslib
74.
Schultze A, Tazare J. The role of programming code sharing in improving the transparency of medical research. BMJ. outubro 2023:p2402. doi:10.1136/bmj.p2402
75.
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2023. https://www.R-project.org/.
76.
Zhao Y, Xiao N, Anderson K, Zhang Y. Electronic common technical document submission with analysis using R. Clinical Trials. 2022;20(1):89–92. doi:10.1177/17407745221123244
77.
Francisco Rodríguez-Sánchez, Connor P. Jackson, Shaurita D. Hutchins. grateful: Facilitate citation of R packages.; 2023. https://github.com/Pakillo/grateful.
78.
Blischak JD, Carbonetto P, Stephens M. Creating and sharing reproducible research code the workflowr way [version 1; peer review: 3 approved]. V 8.; 2019. doi:10.12688/f1000research.20843.1
79.
Sackett DL. Bias in analytic research. Journal of Chronic Diseases. 1979;32(1-2):51–63. doi:10.1016/0021-9681(79)90012-2
80.
Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Bias and causal associations in observational research. The Lancet. 2002;359(9302):248–252. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07451-2
81.
Smith J, Noble H. Bias in research. Evidence Based Nursing. 2014;17(4):100–101. doi:10.1136/eb-2014-101946
82.
Nickerson RS. Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises. Review of General Psychology. 1998;2(2):175–220. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
83.
Song, Eastwood, Gilbody, Duley, Sutton. Publication and related biases. Health Technology Assessment. 2000;4(10). doi:10.3310/hta4100
84.
Wolff RF, Moons KGM, Riley RD, et al. PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2019;170(1):51–58. doi:10.7326/m18-1376
85.
Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. agosto 2019:l4898. doi:10.1136/bmj.l4898
86.
Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. setembro 2017:j4008. doi:10.1136/bmj.j4008
87.
Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. outubro 2016:i4919. doi:10.1136/bmj.i4919
88.
Whiting P, Savović J, Higgins JPT, et al. ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2016;69:225–234. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.06.005
89.
Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME, et al. QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2011;155(8):529–536. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009
90.
Polin BA, Benisaac E. A longitudinal analysis of the hot hand and gambler’s fallacy biases. Judgment and Decision Making. 2023;18. doi:10.1017/jdm.2023.23
91.
Meng XL. Statistical paradises and paradoxes in big data (I): Law of large populations, big data paradox, and the 2016 US presidential election. The Annals of Applied Statistics. 2018;12(2). doi:10.1214/18-aoas1161sf
92.
Abelson RP. A variance explanation paradox: When a little is a lot. Psychological Bulletin. 1985;97(1):129–133. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.97.1.129
93.
Berkson J. Limitations of the Application of Fourfold Table Analysis to Hospital Data. Biometrics Bulletin. 1946;2(3):47. doi:10.2307/3002000
94.
Ellsberg D. Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1961;75(4):643. doi:10.2307/1884324
95.
Freedman DA, Freedman DA. A Note on Screening Regression Equations. The American Statistician. 1983;37(2):152–155. doi:10.1080/00031305.1983.10482729
96.
Freedman LS, Pee D. Return to a Note on Screening Regression Equations. The American Statistician. 1989;43(4):279. doi:10.2307/2685389
97.
Hand DJ. On Comparing Two Treatments. The American Statistician. 1992;46(3):190–192. doi:10.1080/00031305.1992.10475881
98.
LINDLEY DV. A STATISTICAL PARADOX. Biometrika. 1957;44(1-2):187–192. doi:10.1093/biomet/44.1-2.187
99.
Lord FM. A paradox in the interpretation of group comparisons. Psychological Bulletin. 1967;68(5):304–305. doi:10.1037/h0025105
100.
Lord FM. Statistical adjustments when comparing preexisting groups. Psychological Bulletin. 1969;72(5):336–337. doi:10.1037/h0028108
101.
Simpson EH. The Interpretation of Interaction in Contingency Tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological). 1951;13(2):238–241. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1951.tb00088.x
102.
Blyth CR. On Simpson’s Paradox and the Sure-Thing Principle. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1972;67(338):364–366. doi:10.1080/01621459.1972.10482387
103.
Pearl J. Comment: Understanding Simpson’s Paradox. The American Statistician. 2014;68(1):8–13. doi:10.1080/00031305.2014.876829
104.
Stein C. INADMISSIBILITY OF THE USUAL ESTIMATOR FOR THE MEAN OF A MULTIVARIATE NORMAL DISTRIBUTION. Em: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Volume I. University of California Press; 1956:197–206. doi:10.1525/9780520313880-018
105.
James W, Stein C. Estimation with Quadratic Loss. Em: Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Volume 1: Contributions to the Theory of Statistics. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press; 1961:361–379. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.bsmsp/1200512173.
106.
De S, Sen A. The generalised Gamow-Stern problem. The Mathematical Gazette. 1996;80(488):345–348. doi:10.2307/3619568
107.
Feld SL. Why Your Friends Have More Friends Than You Do. American Journal of Sociology. 1991;96(6):1464–1477. doi:10.1086/229693
108.
John LK, Loewenstein G, Prelec D. Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling. Psychological Science. 2012;23(5):524–532. doi:10.1177/0956797611430953
109.
Bausell RB. Too Much Medicine: Not Enough Health. Em: The Problem with Science: The Reproducibility Crisis and What to do About It. New York: Oxford University Press; 2021:56–C3.P203. doi:10.1093/oso/9780197536537.003.0004
110.
Neoh MJY, Carollo A, Lee A, Esposito G. Fifty years of research on questionable research practises in science: quantitative analysis of co-citation patterns. Royal Society Open Science. 2023;10(10). doi:10.1098/rsos.230677
111.
Kleinert S. COPE’s retraction guidelines. The Lancet. 2009;374(9705):1876–1877. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)62074-2
112.
Kerr NL. HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 1998;2(3):196–217. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4
113.
Groot AD de. The meaning of “significance” for different types of research [translated and annotated by Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Denny Borsboom, Josine Verhagen, Rogier Kievit, Marjan Bakker, Angelique Cramer, Dora Matzke, Don Mellenbergh, and Han L. J. van der Maas]. Acta Psychologica. 2014;148:188–194. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.02.001
114.
Andrade C. HARKing, Cherry-Picking, P-Hacking, Fishing Expeditions, and Data Dredging and Mining as Questionable Research Practices. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2021;82(1). doi:10.4088/jcp.20f13804
115.
Stefan AM, Schönbrodt FD. Big little lies: a compendium and simulation ofp-hacking strategies. Royal Society Open Science. 2023;10(2). doi:10.1098/rsos.220346
116.
Chuard PJC, Vrtílek M, Head ML, Jennions MD. Evidence that nonsignificant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting? PLOS Biology. 2019;17(1):e3000127. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000127
117.
Sasaki K, Yamada Y. SPARKing: Sample-size planning after the results are known. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2023;17. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2023.912338
118.
Armitage P, McPherson CK, Rowe BC. Repeated Significance Tests on Accumulating Data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General). 1969;132(2):235. doi:10.2307/2343787
119.
Hutton JL, Williamson PR. Bias in Meta-Analysis Due to Outcome Variable Selection Within Studies. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics. 2000;49(3):359–370. doi:10.1111/1467-9876.00197
120.
Horton R. The rhetoric of research. BMJ. 1995;310(6985):985–987. doi:10.1136/bmj.310.6985.985
121.
Chiu K, Grundy Q, Bero L. ‘Spin’ in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review. Boutron I, org. PLOS Biology. 2017;15(9):e2002173. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2002173
122.
Krok E. Visualization on charts manipulations and distortions. Procedia Computer Science. 2021;192:3932–3944. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.168
123.
Haug CJ. Peer-Review Fraud Hacking the Scientific Publication Process. New England Journal of Medicine. 2015;373(25):2393–2395. doi:10.1056/nejmp1512330
124.
Picano E. Who is the author: genuine, honorary, ghost, gold, and fake authors? Exploration of Cardiology. 2024;2(3):88–96. doi:10.37349/ec.2024.00024
125.
Rosenthal R. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin. 1979;86(3):638–641. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638
126.
Wagner JA. The influence of unpublished studies on results of recent meta-analyses: publication bias, the file drawer problem, and implications for the replication crisis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2021;25(5):639–644. doi:10.1080/13645579.2021.1922805
127.
Adams NN. Salami Slicing: clarifying common misconceptions for social science early-career researchers. SN Social Sciences. 2022;2(7). doi:10.1007/s43545-022-00389-6
128.
Montori VM, Smieja M, Guyatt GH. Publication Bias: A Brief Review for Clinicians. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2000;75(12):1284–1288. doi:10.4065/75.12.1284
129.
Emanuele E. Duplicate Submission, Zero Consequences: A Reviewer’s First-Person Case Study. Cureus. dezembro 2025. doi:10.7759/cureus.99518
130.
Topaz M, Roguin N, Gupta P, Zhang Z, Peltonen LM. Fabricated citations: an audit across 2·5 million biomedical papers. The Lancet. 2026;407(10541):1779–1781. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(26)00603-3
131.
Nosek BA, Ebersole CR, DeHaven AC, Mellor DT. The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018;115(11):2600–2606. doi:10.1073/pnas.1708274114
132.
P. Simmons J, D. Nelson L, Simonsohn U. Pre-registration: Why and How. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 2021;31(1):151–162. doi:10.1002/jcpy.1208
133.
Knoepfler P. Reviewing post-publication peer review. Trends in Genetics. 2015;31(5):221–223. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2015.03.006
134.
Teixeira da Silva JA, Dobránszki J. Notices and Policies for Retractions, Expressions of Concern, Errata and Corrigenda: Their Importance, Content, and Context. Science and Engineering Ethics. 2016;23(2):521–554. doi:10.1007/s11948-016-9769-y
135.
Collier R. Shedding light on retractions. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2011;183(7):E385–E386. doi:10.1503/cmaj.109-3827
136.
Hartgerink C, Aust F. retractcheck: Retraction Scanner.; 2025. https://github.com/chartgerink/retractcheck.
137.
Altman DG, Bland JM. Statistics notes Variables and parameters. BMJ. 1999;318(7199):1667–1667. doi:10.1136/bmj.318.7199.1667
138.
Vetter TR. Fundamentals of Research Data and Variables. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2017;125(4):1375–1380. doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000002370
139.
Ali Z, Bhaskar Sb. Basic statistical tools in research and data analysis. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2016;60(9):662. doi:10.4103/0019-5049.190623
140.
Dettori JR, Norvell DC. The Anatomy of Data. Global Spine Journal. 2018;8(3):311–313. doi:10.1177/2192568217746998
141.
Kaliyadan F, Kulkarni V. Types of variables, descriptive statistics, and sample size. Indian Dermatology Online Journal. 2019;10(1):82. doi:10.4103/idoj.idoj_468_18
142.
Barkan H. Statistics in clinical research: Important considerations. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia. 2015;18(1):74. doi:10.4103/0971-9784.148325
143.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics Notes: Transforming data. BMJ. 1996;312(7033):770–770. doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7033.770
144.
Fedorov V, Mannino F, Zhang R. Consequences of dichotomization. Pharmaceutical Statistics. 2009;8(1):50–61. doi:10.1002/pst.331
145.
Osborne J. Improving your data transformations: Applying the Box-Cox transformation. University of Massachusetts Amherst. 2010. doi:10.7275/QBPC-GK17
146.
Box GEP, Cox DR. An Analysis of Transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological). 1964;26(2):211–243. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x
147.
Venables WN, Ripley BD. Modern Applied Statistics with S. Springer; 2002. https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/MASS4/.
148.
MacCallum RC, Zhang S, Preacher KJ, Rucker DD. On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods. 2002;7(1):19–40. doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.19
149.
Altman DG, Royston P. The cost of dichotomising continuous variables. BMJ. 2006;332(7549):1080.1. doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7549.1080
150.
Royston P, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W. Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea. Statistics in Medicine. 2005;25(1):127–141. doi:10.1002/sim.2331
151.
Collins GS, Ogundimu EO, Cook JA, Manach YL, Altman DG. Quantifying the impact of different approaches for handling continuous predictors on the performance of a prognostic model. Statistics in Medicine. 2016;35(23):4124–4135. doi:10.1002/sim.6986
152.
Nelson SLP, Ramakrishnan V, Nietert PJ, Kamen DL, Ramos PS, Wolf BJ. An evaluation of common methods for dichotomization of continuous variables to discriminate disease status. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods. 2017;46(21):10823–10834. doi:10.1080/03610926.2016.1248783
153.
Bennette C, Vickers A. Against quantiles: categorization of continuous variables in epidemiologic research, and its discontents. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2012;12(1). doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-21
154.
Barnier J, Briatte F, Larmarange J. questionr: Functions to Make Surveys Processing Easier.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=questionr.
155.
Aguinis H, Pierce CA, Culpepper SA. Scale Coarseness as a Methodological Artifact. Organizational Research Methods. 2008;12(4):623–652. doi:10.1177/1094428108318065
156.
Youden WJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer. 1950;3(1):32–35. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::aid-cncr2820030106>3.0.co;2-3
157.
Strobl C, Boulesteix AL, Augustin T. Unbiased split selection for classification trees based on the Gini Index. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis. 2007;52(1):483–501. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2006.12.030
158.
Pearson K. X. On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 1900;50(302):157–175. doi:10.1080/14786440009463897
159.
Greiner M, Pfeiffer D, Smith RD. Principles and practical application of the receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 2000;45(1-2):23–41. doi:10.1016/s0167-5877(00)00115-x
160.
Fleiss JL. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin. 1971;76(5):378–382. doi:10.1037/h0031619
161.
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.; 2025. https://www.R-project.org/.
162.
Norman G. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2010;15(5):625–632. doi:10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
163.
Bryer J, Speerschneider K. likert: Analysis and Visualization Likert Items.; 2016. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=likert.
164.
Larmarange J. ggstats: Extension to ggplot2 for Plotting Stats.; 2025. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.ggstats
165.
Ferris TLJ. A new definition of measurement. Measurement. 2004;36(1):101–109. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2004.03.001
166.
Healy MJR, Goldstein H. Regression to the mean. Annals of Human Biology. 1978;5(3):277–280. doi:10.1080/03014467800002891
167.
Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison Studies. The Statistician. 1983;32(3):307. doi:10.2307/2987937
168.
Menditto A, Patriarca M, Magnusson B. Understanding the meaning of accuracy, trueness and precision. Accreditation and Quality Assurance. 2006;12(1):45–47. doi:10.1007/s00769-006-0191-z
169.
Streiner DL, Norman GR. “Precision” and “Accuracy”: Two Terms That Are Neither. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2006;59(4):327–330. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.09.005
170.
Olson K. What Are Data? Qualitative Health Research. 2021;31(9):1567–1569. doi:10.1177/10497323211015960
171.
Smeden M van. A Very Short List of Common Pitfalls in Research Design, Data Analysis, and Reporting. PRiMER. 2022;6. doi:10.22454/PRiMER.2022.511416
172.
Baillie M, Cessie S le, Schmidt CO, Lusa L, Huebner M. Ten simple rules for initial data analysis. PLOS Computational Biology. 2022;18(2):e1009819. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009819
173.
Buttliere B. Adopting standard variable labels solves many of the problems with sharing and reusing data. Methodological Innovations. 2021;14(2):205979912110266. doi:10.1177/20597991211026616
174.
Pebesma E, Mailund T, Hiebert J. Measurement Units in R. The R Journal. 2016;8. doi:10.32614/RJ-2016-061
175.
Firke S. janitor: Simple Tools for Examining and Cleaning Dirty Data.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=janitor.
176.
Harrell Jr FE. Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Hmisc.
177.
Reese A. Databases and Documenting Data. Significance. 2007;4(4):184–186. doi:10.1111/j.1740-9713.2007.00265.x
178.
Tierney N, Cook D. Expanding Tidy Data Principles to Facilitate Missing Data Exploration, Visualization and Assessment of Imputations. Journal of Statistical Software. 2023;105(7). doi:10.18637/jss.v105.i07
179.
Hammill D. DataEditR: An Interactive Editor for Viewing, Entering, Filtering & Editing Data.; 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DataEditR.
180.
Broman KW, Woo KH. Data Organization in Spreadsheets. The American Statistician. 2018;72(1):2–10. doi:10.1080/00031305.2017.1375989
181.
Juluru K, Eng J. Use of Spreadsheets for Research Data Collection and Preparation: Academic Radiology. 2015;22(12):1592–1599. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2015.08.024
182.
Dowle M, Srinivasan A. data.table: Extension of ‘data.frame‘.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=data.table.
183.
Harron K. Data linkage in medical research. BMJ Medicine. 2022;1(1):e000087. doi:10.1136/bmjmed-2021-000087
184.
Altman DG, Bland JM. Missing data. BMJ. 2007;334(7590):424–424. doi:10.1136/bmj.38977.682025.2c
185.
Heymans MW, Twisk JWR. Handling missing data in clinical research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. setembro 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.08.016
186.
Carpenter JR, Smuk M. Missing data: A statistical framework for practice. Biometrical Journal. 2021;63(5):915–947. doi:10.1002/bimj.202000196
187.
Yanagida T. misty: Miscellaneous Functions.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=misty.
188.
Little RJA. A Test of Missing Completely at Random for Multivariate Data with Missing Values. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1988;83(404):1198–1202. doi:10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722
189.
Tierney N, Cook D. Expanding Tidy Data Principles to Facilitate Missing Data Exploration, Visualization and Assessment of Imputations. Journal of Statistical Software. 2023;105(7):1–31. doi:10.18637/jss.v105.i07
190.
Akl EA, Shawwa K, Kahale LA, et al. Reporting missing participant data in randomised trials: systematic survey of the methodological literature and a proposed guide. BMJ Open. 2015;5(12):e008431. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008431
191.
Buuren S van, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K. mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software. 2011;45:1–67. doi:10.18637/jss.v045.i03
192.
Rubin DB. Statistical Matching Using File Concatenation with Adjusted Weights and Multiple Imputations. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics. 1986;4(1):87. doi:10.2307/1391390
193.
Little RJA. Missing-Data Adjustments in Large Surveys. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics. 1988;6(3):287–296. doi:10.1080/07350015.1988.10509663
194.
Robitzsch A, Grund S. miceadds: Some Additional Multiple Imputation Functions, Especially for mice.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=miceadds.
195.
Gadotti A, Rocher L, Houssiau F, Creţu AM, Montjoye YA de. Anonymization: The imperfect science of using data while preserving privacy. Science Advances. 2024;10(29). doi:10.1126/sciadv.adn7053
196.
Templ M, Kowarik A, Meindl B. Statistical Disclosure Control for Micro-Data Using theRPackagesdcMicro. Journal of Statistical Software. 2015;67(4). doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i04
197.
Giuffrè M, Shung DL. Harnessing the power of synthetic data in healthcare: innovation, application, and privacy. npj Digital Medicine. 2023;6(1). doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00927-3
198.
FitzJohn R. ids: Generate Random Identifiers.; 2017. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ids.
199.
Brown C. hash: Full Featured Implementation of Hash Tables/Associative Arrays/Dictionaries.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=hash.
200.
Hendricks P. anonymizer: Anonymize Data Containing Personally Identifiable Information.; 2023. https://github.com/paulhendricks/anonymizer.
201.
Lucas DE with contributions by A, Tuszynski J, Bengtsson H, et al. digest: Create Compact Hash Digests of R Objects.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=digest.
202.
Templ M, Kowarik A, Meindl B. Statistical Disclosure Control for Micro-Data Using the R Package sdcMicro. V 67.; 2015. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i04
203.
Naughton M, Weaving D, Scott T, Compton H. Synthetic Data as a Strategy to Resolve Data Privacy and Confidentiality Concerns in the Sport Sciences: Practical Examples and an R Shiny Application. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 2023;18(10):1213–1218. doi:10.1123/ijspp.2023-0007
204.
Nowok B, Raab GM, Dibben C. synthpop: Bespoke Creation of Synthetic Data in R. Journal of Statistical Software. 2016;74. doi:10.18637/jss.v074.i11
205.
WILD C. THE CONCEPT OF DISTRIBUTION. STATISTICS EDUCATION RESEARCH JOURNAL. 2006;5(2):10–26. doi:10.52041/serj.v5i2.497
206.
S M. Frequency distribution. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics. 2011;2(1):54–56. doi:10.4103/0976-500x.77120
207.
Sturges HA. The Choice of a Class Interval. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1926;21(153):65–66. doi:10.1080/01621459.1926.10502161
208.
SCOTT DW. On optimal and data-based histograms. Biometrika. 1979;66(3):605–610. doi:10.1093/biomet/66.3.605
209.
Freedman D, Diaconis P. On the histogram as a density estimator:L 2 theory. Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete. 1981;57(4):453–476. doi:10.1007/bf01025868
210.
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.; 2023. https://www.R-project.org/.
211.
Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer; 2016. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org.
212.
Kay M. ggdist: Visualizations of Distributions and Uncertainty in the Grammar of Graphics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. 2024;30(1):414–424. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2023.3327195
213.
Tang Y, Horikoshi M, Li W. ggfortify: Unified Interface to Visualize Statistical Result of Popular R Packages. V 8.; 2016. doi:10.32614/RJ-2016-060
214.
Darling HS. Do you have a standard way of interpreting the standard deviation? A narrative review. Cancer Research, Statistics, and Treatment. 2022;5(4):728–733. doi:10.4103/crst.crst_284_22
215.
Kanji G. 100 Statistical Tests. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2006. doi:10.4135/9781849208499
216.
Curran-Everett D. Explorations in statistics: standard deviations and standard errors. Advances in Physiology Education. 2008;32(3):203–208. doi:10.1152/advan.90123.2008
217.
Altman DG, Bland JM. Statistics Notes: Quartiles, quintiles, centiles, and other quantiles. BMJ. 1994;309(6960):996–996. doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6960.996
218.
S. M. Measures of central tendency: The mean. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics. 2011;2(2):140–142. doi:10.4103/0976-500x.81920
219.
S. M. Measures of central tendency: Median and mode. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics. 2011;2(3):214–215. doi:10.4103/0976-500x.83300
220.
Krzywinski M, Altman N. Error bars. Nature Methods. 2013;10(10):921–922. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2659
221.
Manikandan S. Measures of dispersion. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics. 2011;2(4):315–316. doi:10.4103/0976-500x.85931
222.
Sahai H, Misra S. Definitions of Sample Variance: Some Teaching Problems to be Overcome. The Statistician. 1992;41(1):55. doi:10.2307/2348636
223.
Daszykowski M, Kaczmarek K, Vander Heyden Y, Walczak B. Robust statistics in data analysis A review. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems. 2007;85(2):203–219. doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2006.06.016
224.
Rousseeuw PJ, Hubert M. Robust statistics for outlier detection. WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. 2011;1(1):73–79. doi:10.1002/widm.2
225.
Inskip H, Ntani G, Westbury L, et al. Getting started with tables. Archives of Public Health. 2017;75(1). doi:10.1186/s13690-017-0180-1
226.
Kwak SG, Kang H, Kim JH, et al. The principles of presenting statistical results: Table. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. 2021;74(2):115–119. doi:10.4097/kja.20582
227.
Sjoberg DD, Whiting K, Curry M, Lavery JA, Larmarange J. Reproducible Summary Tables with the gtsummary Package. The R Journal. 2021;13:570–580. doi:10.32614/RJ-2021-053
228.
Rich B. table1: Tables of Descriptive Statistics in HTML.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=table1.
229.
Gohel D, Skintzos P. flextable: Functions for Tabular Reporting.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=flextable.
230.
Thériault R. rempsyc: Convenience functions for psychology. Journal of Open Source Software. 2023;8:5466. doi:10.21105/joss.05466
231.
Barnett A. Automated detection of over- and under-dispersion in baseline tables in randomised controlled trials. F1000Research. 2023;11:783. doi:10.12688/f1000research.123002.2
232.
Westreich D, Greenland S. The Table 2 Fallacy: Presenting and Interpreting Confounder and Modifier Coefficients. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2013;177(4):292–298. doi:10.1093/aje/kws412
233.
Chen H, Lu Y, Slye N. Testing for baseline differences in clinical trials. International Journal of Clinical Trials. 2020;7(2):150. doi:10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20201720
234.
Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper: Statistics for the non-statistician. I: Different types of data need different statistical tests. BMJ. 1997;315(7104):364–366. doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7104.364
235.
Hayes-Larson E, Kezios KL, Mooney SJ, Lovasi G. Who is in this study, anyway? Guidelines for a useful Table 1. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2019;114:125–132. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.06.011
236.
Pijls BG. The Table I Fallacy: P Values in Baseline Tables of Randomized Controlled Trials. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2022;104(16):e71. doi:10.2106/jbjs.21.01166
237.
Weissgerber TL, Winham SJ, Heinzen EP, et al. Reveal, Don’t Conceal. Circulation. 2019;140(18):1506–1518. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.118.037777
238.
Bandoli G, Palmsten K, Chambers CD, Jelliffe-Pawlowski LL, Baer RJ, Thompson CA. Revisiting the Table 2 fallacy: A motivating example examining preeclampsia and preterm birth. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. 2018;32(4):390–397. doi:10.1111/ppe.12474
239.
Midway SR. Principles of Effective Data Visualization. Patterns. 2020;1(9):100141. doi:10.1016/j.patter.2020.100141
240.
Park JH, Lee DK, Kang H, et al. The principles of presenting statistical results using figures. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. 2022;75(2):139–150. doi:10.4097/kja.21508
241.
Vandemeulebroecke M, Baillie M, Carr D, et al. How can we make better graphs? An initiative to increase the graphical expertise and productivity of quantitative scientists. Pharmaceutical Statistics. 2018;18(1):106–114. doi:10.1002/pst.1912
242.
Cumming G, Fidler F, Vaux DL. Error bars in experimental biology. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2007;177(1):7–11. doi:10.1083/jcb.200611141
243.
Sievert C. Interactive Web-Based Data Visualization with R, plotly, and shiny. Chapman; Hall/CRC; 2020. https://plotly-r.com.
244.
Wei T, Simko V. R package corrplot: Visualization of a Correlation Matrix.; 2024. https://github.com/taiyun/corrplot.
245.
Wise EA, Adams RJ, Lyketsos CG, Leoutsakos JM. Graphical methods for understanding changes in states: Understanding medication use pathways. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research. 2022;31(4). doi:10.1002/mpr.1932
246.
Swihart BJ, Caffo B, James BD, Strand M, Schwartz BS, Punjabi NM. Lasagna Plots. Epidemiology. 2010;21(5):621–625. doi:10.1097/ede.0b013e3181e5b06a
247.
Mercier F, Consalvo N, Frey N, Phipps A, Ribba B. From waterfall plots to spaghetti plots in early oncology clinical development. Pharmaceutical Statistics. 2019;18(5):526–532. doi:10.1002/pst.1944
248.
Xiao N. ggsci: Scientific Journal and Sci-Fi Themed Color Palettes for ggplot2.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggsci.
249.
Urbanek S, Johnson K. tiff: Read and Write TIFF Images.; 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tiff.
250.
Kimber O, Cromley JG, Molnar-Kimber KL. Let Your Ideas Flow: Using Flowcharts to Convey Methods and Implications of the Results in Laboratory Exercises, Articles, Posters, and Slide Presentations. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education. 2018;19(1). doi:10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1477
251.
Ensmenger N. The Multiple Meanings of a Flowchart. Information & Culture: A Journal of History. 2016;51(3):321–351. doi:10.1353/lac.2016.0013
252.
Haddaway NR, Page MJ, Pritchard CC, McGuinness LA. PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 2022;18:e1230. doi:10.1002/cl2.1230
253.
Dayim A. consort: Create Consort Diagram.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=consort.
254.
Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Thorpe A, Fagerlin A. How to Communicate Medical Numbers. JAMA. 2025;334(16):1474. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.13655
255.
Green DJ, Smith D, Whittle R. Top 10 statistical pitfalls: a reviewer’s guide to avoiding common errors. Heart. 2025;112(3):139–143. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2025-325939
256.
Makowski D, Lüdecke D, Patil I, Thériault R, Ben-Shachar MS, Wiernik BM. Automated Results Reporting as a Practical Tool to Improve Reproducibility and Methodological Best Practices Adoption.; 2023. https://easystats.github.io/report/.
257.
Nuijten MB, Epskamp S. statcheck: Extract Statistics from Articles and Recompute P-Values.; 2024. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.statcheck
258.
Wallisch C, Bach P, Hafermann L, et al. Review of guidance papers on regression modeling in statistical series of medical journals. Mathes T, org. PLOS ONE. 2022;17(1):e0262918. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0262918
259.
Lynggaard H, Bell J, Lösch C, et al. Principles and recommendations for incorporating estimands into clinical study protocol templates. Trials. 2022;23(1). doi:10.1186/s13063-022-06515-2
260.
Dwivedi AK. How to Write Statistical Analysis Section in Medical Research. Journal of Investigative Medicine. 2022;70(8):1759–1770. doi:10.1136/jim-2022-002479
261.
Althouse AD, Below JE, Claggett BL, et al. Recommendations for Statistical Reporting in Cardiovascular Medicine: A Special Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;144(4). doi:10.1161/circulationaha.121.055393
262.
Lee KJ, Tilling KM, Cornish RP, et al. Framework for the treatment and reporting of missing data in observational studies: The Treatment And Reporting of Missing data in Observational Studies framework. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2021;134:79–88. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.008
263.
Vickers AJ, Assel MJ, Sjoberg DD, et al. Guidelines for Reporting of Figures and Tables for Clinical Research in Urology. Urology. 2020;142:1–13. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2020.05.002
264.
Assel M, Sjoberg D, Elders A, et al. Guidelines for Reporting of Statistics for Clinical Research in Urology. Journal of Urology. 2019;201(3):595–604. doi:10.1097/ju.0000000000000001
265.
Lang TA, Altman DG. Basic statistical reporting for articles published in Biomedical Journals: The “Statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature” or the SAMPL Guidelines. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2015;52(1):5–9. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.09.006
266.
Weissgerber TL, Milic NM, Winham SJ, Garovic VD. Beyond Bar and Line Graphs: Time for a New Data Presentation Paradigm. PLOS Biology. 2015;13(4):e1002128. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002128
267.
Sauerbrei W, Abrahamowicz M, Altman DG, Cessie S, Carpenter J. STRengthening Analytical Thinking for Observational Studies: the STRATOS initiative. Statistics in Medicine. 2014;33(30):5413–5432. doi:10.1002/sim.6265
268.
Groves T. Research methods and reporting. BMJ. 2008;337(oct22 1):a2201–a2201. doi:10.1136/bmj.a2201
269.
Stratton IM, Neil A. How to ensure your paper is rejected by the statistical reviewer. Diabetic Medicine. 2005;22(4):371–373. doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01443.x
270.
Mansournia MA, Collins GS, Nielsen RO, et al. A CHecklist for statistical Assessment of Medical Papers (the CHAMP statement): explanation and elaboration. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2021;55(18):1009–1017. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2020-103652
271.
Gil-Sierra MD, Fénix-Caballero S, Abdel kader-Martin L, et al. Checklist for clinical applicability of subgroup analysis. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics. 2019;45(3):530–538. doi:10.1111/jcpt.13102
272.
Dwivedi AK, Shukla R. Evidence-based statistical analysis and methods in biomedical research (SAMBR) checklists according to design features. CANCER REPORTS. 2019;3(4). doi:10.1002/cnr2.1211
273.
Vickers AJ, Assel M, Dunn RL, et al. Guidelines for Reporting Observational Research in Urology: The Importance of Clear Reference to Causality. European Urology. 2023;84(2):147–151. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.027
274.
Lee H, Cashin AG, Lamb SE, et al. A Guideline for Reporting Mediation Analyses of Randomized Trials and Observational Studies. JAMA. 2021;326(11):1045. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.14075
275.
Chatfield C. Exploratory data analysis. European Journal of Operational Research. 1986;23(1):5–13. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(86)90209-2
276.
Ferketich S, Verran J. Technical Notes. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 1986;8(4):464–466. doi:10.1177/019394598600800409
277.
Landis SC, Amara SG, Asadullah K, et al. A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research. Nature. 2012;490(7419):187–191. doi:10.1038/nature11556
278.
Huebner M, Vach W, Cessie S le. A systematic approach to initial data analysis is good research practice. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2016;151(1):25–27. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.09.085
279.
Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Elphick CS. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2009;1(1):3–14. doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2009.00001.x
280.
Krasser R. explore: Simplifies Exploratory Data Analysis.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=explore.
281.
Petersen AH, Ekstrøm CT. dataMaid: Your Assistant for Documenting Supervised Data Quality Screening in R. Journal of Statistical Software. 2019;90. doi:10.18637/jss.v090.i06
282.
Cui B. DataExplorer: Automate Data Exploration and Treatment.; 2020. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DataExplorer.
283.
Dayanand Ubrangala, R K, Prasad Kondapalli R, Putatunda S. SmartEDA: Summarize and Explore the Data.; 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=SmartEDA.
284.
Mock T. gtExtras: Extending gt for Beautiful HTML Tables.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gtExtras.
285.
Nijs V. radiant: Business Analytics using R and Shiny.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=radiant.
286.
Behrens JT. Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psychological Methods. 1997;2(2):131–160. doi:10.1037/1082-989x.2.2.131
287.
Prunello M, Mari G. ggcleveland: Implementation of Plots from Cleveland’s Visualizing Data Book.; 2021. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.ggcleveland
288.
Anscombe FJ. Graphs in Statistical Analysis. The American Statistician. 1973;27(1):17–21. doi:10.1080/00031305.1973.10478966
289.
Northrop PJ. anscombiser: Create Datasets with Identical Summary Statistics.; 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=anscombiser.
290.
Gerring J. Mere Description. British Journal of Political Science. 2012;42(4):721–746. doi:10.1017/s0007123412000130
291.
Meyer F, Perrier V. esquisse: Explore and Visualize Your Data Interactively.; 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=esquisse.
292.
Cummings P, Rivara FP. Reporting Statistical Information in Medical Journal Articles. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. 2003;157(4):321. doi:10.1001/archpedi.157.4.321
293.
Cole TJ. Setting number of decimal places for reporting risk ratios: rule of four. BMJ. 2015;350(apr27 3):h1845–h1845. doi:10.1136/bmj.h1845
294.
Cole TJ. Too many digits: the presentation of numerical data. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2015;100(7):608–609. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2014-307149
295.
Mair P, Wilcox R. Robust Statistical Methods in R Using the WRS2 Package. Behavior Research Methods. 2020;52:464–488. doi:10.3758/s13428-019-01246-w
296.
Leys C, Delacre M, Mora YL, Lakens D, Ley C. How to Classify, Detect, and Manage Univariate and Multivariate Outliers, With Emphasis on Pre-Registration. International Review of Social Psychology. 2019;32(1). doi:10.5334/irsp.289
297.
Leys C, Ley C, Klein O, Bernard P, Licata L. Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2013;49(4):764–766. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.013
298.
Leys C, Klein O, Dominicy Y, Ley C. Detecting multivariate outliers: Use a robust variant of the Mahalanobis distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2018;74:150–156. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.09.011
299.
Tukey JW, McLaughlin DH. Less Vulnerable Confidence and Significance Procedures for Location Based on a Single Sample: Trimming/Winsorization 1. Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A (1961-2002). 1963;25(3):331–352. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25049278. Acesso em abril 11, 2025.
300.
Komsta L. outliers: Tests for Outliers.; 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=outliers.
301.
Loh PL. A Theoretical Review of Modern Robust Statistics. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application. 2025;12(1):477–496. doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-112723-034446
302.
Mair P, Wilcox R, Indrajeet P. A Collection of Robust Statistical Methods.; 2025. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=WRS2.
303.
Smeden M van, Reitsma JB, Riley RD, Collins GS, Moons KG. Clinical prediction models: diagnosis versus prognosis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2021;132:142–145. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.009
304.
Van Calster B, Smeden M van, Amsterdam W van, Coemans M, Wynants L, Steyerberg EW. The Enemies of Reliable and Useful Clinical Prediction Models: A Review of Statistical and Scientific Challenges. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application. 2026;13(1):465–492. doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-042324-123749
305.
Van Calster B, Steyerberg EW, Wynants L, Smeden M van. There is no such thing as a validated prediction model. BMC Medicine. 2023;21(1). doi:10.1186/s12916-023-02779-w
306.
Lüdecke D. ggeffects: Tidy Data Frames of Marginal Effects from Regression Models. Journal of Open Source Software. 2018;3:772. doi:10.21105/joss.00772
307.
Song YY, Lu Y. Decision tree methods: applications for classification and prediction. Shanghai archives of psychiatry. 2015;27(2):130–135. doi:10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.215044
308.
Vickers AJ, Calster B van, Steyerberg EW. A simple, step-by-step guide to interpreting decision curve analysis. Diagnostic and Prognostic Research. 2019;3(1). doi:10.1186/s41512-019-0064-7
309.
Hozo I, Guyatt G, Djulbegovic B. Decision curve analysis based on summary data. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2023;30(2):281–289. doi:10.1111/jep.13945
310.
Pearl J. The Causal Foundations of Structural Equation Modeling. Defense Technical Information Center; 2012. doi:10.21236/ada557445
311.
Hill AB. The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation? Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine. 1965;58(5):295–300. doi:10.1177/003591576505800503
312.
Rothman KJ, Greenland S. H ill’s Criteria for Causality. Encyclopedia of Biostatistics. fevereiro 2005. doi:10.1002/0470011815.b2a03072
313.
Shimonovich M, Pearce A, Thomson H, Keyes K, Katikireddi SV. Assessing causality in epidemiology: revisiting Bradford Hill to incorporate developments in causal thinking. European Journal of Epidemiology. 2020;36(9):873–887. doi:10.1007/s10654-020-00703-7
314.
Tennant PWG, Murray EJ, Arnold KF, et al. Use of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to identify confounders in applied health research: review and recommendations. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2020;50(2):620–632. doi:10.1093/ije/dyaa213
315.
Textor J, Zander B van der, Gilthorpe MS, Liskiewicz M, Ellison GT. Robust causal inference using directed acyclic graphs: the R package dagitty. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2016;45:1887–1894. doi:10.1093/ije/dyw341
316.
Barrett M. ggdag: Analyze and Create Elegant Directed Acyclic Graphs.; 2024. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggdag.
317.
Lüdecke D, Ben-Shachar MS, Patil I, Waggoner P, Makowski D. performance: An R Package for Assessment, Comparison and Testing of Statistical Models. Journal of Open Source Software. 2021;6:3139. doi:10.21105/joss.03139
318.
Webster JJ, Kit C. Tokenization as the initial phase in NLP. Em: Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Computational Linguistics - Volume 4. COLING ’92. USA: Association for Computational Linguistics; 1992:1106–1110. doi:10.3115/992424.992434
319.
Brown PF, deSouza PV, Mercer RL, Pietra VJD, Lai JC. Class-based n-gram models of natural language. Comput Linguist. 1992;18(4):467–479.
320.
Jardino M. Multilingual stochastic n-gram class language models. 1996 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Conference Proceedings. 1996;1:161–163. doi:10.1109/icassp.1996.540315
321.
Silge J, Robinson D. tidytext: Text Mining and Analysis Using Tidy Data Principles in R. The Journal of Open Source Software. 2016;1. doi:10.21105/joss.00037
322.
Greenland S. Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis. American Journal of Public Health. 1989;79(3):340–349. doi:10.2105/ajph.79.3.340
323.
Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper: Statistics for the non-statistician. II: ̈Significanẗ relations and their pitfalls. BMJ. 1997;315(7105):422–425. doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7105.422
324.
Box GEP. Science and Statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1976;71(356):791–799. doi:10.1080/01621459.1976.10480949
325.
Ploeg T van der, Austin PC, Steyerberg EW. Modern modelling techniques are data hungry: a simulation study for predicting dichotomous endpoints. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2014;14(1). doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-137
326.
Arel-Bundock V. modelsummary: Data and Model Summaries in R. Journal of Statistical Software. 2022;103. doi:10.18637/jss.v103.i01
327.
Anderson D, Heiss A, Sumners J. equatiomatic: Transform Models into LaTeX Equations.; 2024. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=equatiomatic.
328.
Hidalgo B, Goodman M. Multivariate or Multivariable Regression? American Journal of Public Health. 2013;103(1):39–40. doi:10.2105/ajph.2012.300897
329.
Lopez Bernal J, Cummins S, Gasparrini A. Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial. International Journal of Epidemiology. junho 2016:dyw098. doi:10.1093/ije/dyw098
330.
Kontopantelis E, Doran T, Springate DA, Buchan I, Reeves D. Regression based quasi-experimental approach when randomisation is not an option: interrupted time series analysis. BMJ. 2015;350(jun09 5):h2750–h2750. doi:10.1136/bmj.h2750
331.
Fernandes AAT, Figueiredo Filho DB, Rocha EC da, Nascimento W da S. Read this paper if you want to learn logistic regression. Revista de Sociologia e Política. 2020;28(74). doi:10.1590/1678-987320287406en
332.
Bours MJL. Using mediators to understand effect modification and interaction. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. setembro 2023. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.09.005
333.
Altman DG, Matthews JNS. Statistics Notes: Interaction 1: heterogeneity of effects. BMJ. 1996;313(7055):486–486. doi:10.1136/bmj.313.7055.486
334.
Pinheiro J, Bates D, R Core Team. nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme.
335.
Sabanes Bove D, Dedic J, Kelkhoff D, et al. mmrm: Mixed Models for Repeated Measures.; 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mmrm.
336.
Lenth RV. emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans.
337.
Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderatormediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;51(6):1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
338.
Suits DB. Use of Dummy Variables in Regression Equations. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1957;52(280):548–551. doi:10.1080/01621459.1957.10501412
339.
Healy MJ. Statistics from the inside. 16. Multiple regression (2). Archives of Disease in Childhood. 1995;73(3):270–274. doi:10.1136/adc.73.3.270
340.
Kaplan J. fastDummies: Fast Creation of Dummy (Binary) Columns and Rows from Categorical Variables.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=fastDummies.
341.
Kim JH. Multicollinearity and misleading statistical results. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. 2019;72(6):558–569. doi:10.4097/kja.19087
342.
Schloerke B, Cook D, Larmarange J, et al. GGally: Extension to ggplot2.; 2024. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.GGally
343.
Sun GW, Shook TL, Kay GL. Inappropriate use of bivariable analysis to screen risk factors for use in multivariable analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1996;49(8):907–916. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(96)00025-x
344.
Fox J, Weisberg S. An R Companion to Applied Regression. Sage Publications, Inc.; 2019. https://www.john-fox.ca/Companion/.
345.
DALES LG, URY HK. An Improper Use of Statistical Significance Testing in Studying Covariables. International Journal of Epidemiology. 1978;7(4):373–376. doi:10.1093/ije/7.4.373
346.
Heinze G, Dunkler D. Five myths about variable selection. Transplant International. 2016;30(1):6–10. doi:10.1111/tri.12895
347.
Lindsey C, Sheather S. Variable Selection in Linear Regression. The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata. 2011;10(4):650–669. doi:10.1177/1536867x1001000407
348.
Miller TL based on F code by A. leaps: Regression Subset Selection.; 2024. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.leaps
349.
Hebbali A. olsrr: Tools for Building OLS Regression Models.; 2024. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.olsrr
350.
Henderson T. correctR: Corrected Test Statistics for Comparing Machine Learning Models on Correlated Samples.; 2025. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=correctR.
351.
Fan Y, Chen J, Shirkey G, et al. Applications of structural equation modeling (SEM) in ecological studies: an updated review. Ecological Processes. 2016;5(1). doi:10.1186/s13717-016-0063-3
352.
Revelle W. The seductive beauty of latent variable models: Or why I don’t believe in the Easter Bunny. Personality and Individual Differences. 2024;221:112552. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2024.112552
353.
Legate AE, Ringle CM, Hair JF. PLS-SEM: A method demonstration in the R statistical environment. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 2023;35(4):501–529. doi:10.1002/hrdq.21517
354.
Rosseel Y, Jorgensen TD, De Wilde L. lavaan: Latent Variable Analysis.; 2025. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.lavaan
355.
In J, Lee DK. Survival analysis: Part I analysis of time-to-event. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. 2018;71(3):182–191. doi:10.4097/kja.d.18.00067
356.
Hanada K, Moriya J, Kojima M. Comparison of baseline covariate adjustment methods for restricted mean survival time. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 2024;138:107440. doi:10.1016/j.cct.2024.107440
357.
Therneau TM. A Package for Survival Analysis in R.; 2024. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival.
358.
Kassambara A, Kosinski M, Biecek P. survminer: Drawing Survival Curves using ’ggplot2’.; 2025. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.survminer
359.
Theiler J, Eubank S, Longtin A, Galdrikian B, Doyne Farmer J. Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena. 1992;58(1-4):77–94. doi:10.1016/0167-2789(92)90102-s
360.
Diego J. Pedregal. UComp: Automatic Univariate Time Series Modelling of many Kinds.; 2025. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.UComp
361.
Pebesma E, Bivand R. Spatial Data Science: With applications in R. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; 2023. doi:10.1201/9780429459016
362.
Cheng J, Schloerke B, Karambelkar B, Xie Y, Aden-Buie G. leaflet: Create Interactive Web Maps with the JavaScript ’Leaflet’ Library.; 2025. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.leaflet
363.
HÄGGSTRÖM O. Problem Solving is Often a Matter of Cooking Up an Appropriate Markov Chain*. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics. 2007;34(4):768–780. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9469.2007.00561.x
364.
Spedicato GA. Discrete Time Markov Chains with R. The R Journal. 2017;9(2):84–104. doi:10.32614/RJ-2017-036
365.
Leme DE da C, Alves EV da C, Lemos V do CO, Fattori A. NETWORK ANALYSIS: A MULTIVARIATE STATISTICAL APPROACH FOR HEALTH SCIENCE RESEARCH. Geriatrics, Gerontology and Aging. 2020;14(1):43–51. doi:10.5327/z2447-212320201900073
366.
Fruchterman TMJ, Reingold EM. Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software: Practice and Experience. 1991;21(11):1129–1164. doi:10.1002/spe.4380211102
367.
Csárdi G, Nepusz T. The igraph software package for complex network research. V Complex Systems.; 2006:1695. https://igraph.org.
368.
Epskamp S, Borsboom D, Fried EI. Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy: A Tutorial Paper. V 50.; 2018.
369.
Haslbeck JMB, Waldorp LJ. mgm: Estimating Time-Varying Mixed Graphical Models in High-Dimensional Data. V 93.; 2020. doi:10.18637/jss.v093.i08
370.
Ali S, Abuhmed T, El-Sappagh S, et al. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): What we know and what is left to attain Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence. Information Fusion. 2023;99:101805. doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101805
371.
Adadi A, Berrada M. Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access. 2018;6:52138–52160. doi:10.1109/access.2018.2870052
372.
Vilone G, Longo L. Notions of explainability and evaluation approaches for explainable artificial intelligence. Information Fusion. 2021;76:89–106. doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.05.009
373.
Allaire J, Chollet F. keras: R Interface to Keras.; 2024. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.keras
374.
Allaire J, Tang Y. tensorflow: R Interface to ’TensorFlow’.; 2025. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.tensorflow
375.
Ushey K, Allaire J, Tang Y. reticulate: Interface to Python.; 2025. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.reticulate
376.
Burger T. Keeping generative artificial intelligence reliable in omics biology. Patterns. 2026;7(1):101417. doi:10.1016/j.patter.2025.101417
377.
Korkmaz S, Goksuluk D, Karaismailoglu E. fastml: Guarded Resampling Workflows for Safe and Automated Machine Learning in R.; 2026. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.fastml
378.
Bzdok D, Krzywinski M, Altman N. Machine learning: supervised methods. Nature Methods. 2018;15(1):5–6. doi:10.1038/nmeth.4551
379.
Chang A, Tang T, Zikry T, Allen G. Unsupervised machine learning for scientific discovery: workflow and best practices. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2026;384(2321). doi:10.1098/rsta.2024.0602
380.
Hand DJ. Classifier Technology and the Illusion of Progress. Statistical Science. 2006;21(1). doi:10.1214/088342306000000060
381.
Sidey-Gibbons JAM, Sidey-Gibbons CJ. Machine learning in medicine: a practical introduction. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2019;19(1). doi:10.1186/s12874-019-0681-4
382.
Andaur Navarro CL, Damen JAA, Smeden M van, et al. Systematic review identifies the design and methodological conduct of studies on machine learning-based prediction models. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2023;154:8–22. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.11.015
383.
Lever J, Krzywinski M, Altman N. Logistic regression. Nature Methods. 2016;13(7):541–542. doi:10.1038/nmeth.3904
384.
Krzywinski M, Altman N. Classification and regression trees. Nature Methods. 2017;14(8):757–758. doi:10.1038/nmeth.4370
385.
Fryda T, LeDell E, Gill N, et al. h2o: R Interface for the ’H2O’ Scalable Machine Learning Platform.; 2024. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.h2o
386.
Kuhn, Max. Building Predictive Models in R Using the caret Package. Journal of Statistical Software. 2008;28(5):1–26. doi:10.18637/jss.v028.i05
387.
Lang M, Binder M, Richter J, et al. mlr3: A modern object-oriented machine learning framework in R.; 2019. doi:10.21105/joss.01903
388.
Schubert E. Stop using the elbow criterion for k-means and how to choose the number of clusters instead. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter. 2023;25(1):36–42. doi:10.1145/3606274.3606278
389.
Dyer EL, Kording K. Why the simplest explanation isn’t always the best. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2023;120(52). doi:10.1073/pnas.2319169120
390.
Van Calster B, Collins GS, Vickers AJ, et al. Evaluation of performance measures in predictive artificial intelligence models to support medical decisions: overview and guidance. The Lancet Digital Health. 2025;7(12):100916. doi:10.1016/j.landig.2025.100916
391.
Assel M, Vickers A. The F score ranks diagnostic tests and prediction models inconsistently with their clinical utility. Diagnostic and Prognostic Research. 2025;9(1). doi:10.1186/s41512-025-00214-7
392.
Hicks SA, Strümke I, Thambawita V, et al. On evaluation metrics for medical applications of artificial intelligence. Scientific Reports. 2022;12(1). doi:10.1038/s41598-022-09954-8
393.
Megahed FM, Chen YJ, Jones-Farmer LA, Rigdon SE, Krzywinski M, Altman N. Comparing classifier performance with baselines. Nature Methods. 2024;21(4):546–548. doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02234-5
394.
Carriero A, Luijken K, Hond A de, Moons KGM, Calster B van, Smeden M van. The Harms of Class Imbalance Corrections for Machine Learning Based Prediction Models: A Simulation Study. Statistics in Medicine. 2025;44(3-4). doi:10.1002/sim.10320
395.
McCulloch WS, Pitts W. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics. 1943;5(4):115–133. doi:10.1007/bf02478259
396.
Rosenblatt F. The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychological Review. 1958;65(6):386–408. doi:10.1037/h0042519
397.
Rosenblatt F. Perceptron Simulation Experiments. Proceedings of the IRE. 1960;48(3):301–309. doi:10.1109/jrproc.1960.287598
398.
Fritsch S, Guenther F, Wright MN. neuralnet: Training of Neural Networks.; 2019. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.neuralnet
399.
Bargheet A. AssumpSure: a user-friendly R Shiny package for automated validation of statistical assumptions and appropriate test selection. Journal of Open Source Software. 2025;10:9286. doi:10.21105/joss.09286
400.
Rochon J, Gondan M, Kieser M. To test or not to test: Preliminary assessment of normality when comparing two independent samples. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2012;12(1). doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-81
401.
Schmider E, Ziegler M, Danay E, Beyer L, Bühner M. Is It Really Robust? Methodology. 2010;6(4):147–151. doi:10.1027/1614-2241/a000016
402.
Curran-Everett D. Explorations in statistics: hypothesis tests and P values. Advances in Physiology Education. 2009;33(2):81–86. doi:10.1152/advan.90218.2008
403.
Goodman SN. Toward Evidence-Based Medical Statistics. 1: The P Value Fallacy. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1999;130(12):995. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-130-12-199906150-00008
404.
McCaskey K, Rainey C. Substantive Importance and the Veil of Statistical Significance. Statistics, Politics and Policy. 2015;6(1-2). doi:10.1515/spp-2015-0001
405.
Couch SP, Bray AP, Ismay C, Chasnovski E, Baumer BS, Çetinkaya-Rundel M. infer: An R package for tidyverse-friendly statistical inference. V 6.; 2021:3661. doi:10.21105/joss.03661
406.
Uygun Tunç D, Tunç MN, Lakens D. The epistemic and pragmatic function of dichotomous claims based on statistical hypothesis tests. Theory & Psychology. 2023;33(3):403–423. doi:10.1177/09593543231160112
407.
Vandenbroucke JP, Pearce N. From ideas to studies: how to get ideas and sharpen them into research questions. Clinical Epidemiology. 2018;Volume 10:253–264. doi:10.2147/clep.s142940
408.
Lakens D, Scheel AM, Isager PM. Equivalence Testing for Psychological Research: A Tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. 2018;1(2):259–269. doi:10.1177/2515245918770963
409.
Mazzolari R, Porcelli S, Bishop DJ, Lakens D. Myths and methodologies: The use of equivalence and non-inferiority tests for interventional studies in exercise physiology and sport science. Experimental Physiology. 2022;107(3):201–212. doi:10.1113/ep090171
410.
Kaiser HF. Directional statistical decisions. Psychological Review. 1960;67(3):160–167. doi:10.1037/h0047595
411.
Sullivan GM, Feinn R. Using Effect Sizeor Why the P Value Is Not Enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education. 2012;4(3):279–282. doi:10.4300/jgme-d-12-00156.1
412.
Neyman J. Outline of a Theory of Statistical Estimation Based on the Classical Theory of Probability. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 1937;236(767):333–380. doi:10.1098/rsta.1937.0005
413.
Goodman SN. Aligning statistical and scientific reasoning. Science. 2016;352(6290):1180–1181. doi:10.1126/science.aaf5406
414.
Greenland S, Senn SJ, Rothman KJ, et al. Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations. European Journal of Epidemiology. 2016;31(4):337–350. doi:10.1007/s10654-016-0149-3
415.
Cumming G, Finch S. Inference by Eye: Confidence Intervals and How to Read Pictures of Data. American Psychologist. 2005;60(2):170–180. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.60.2.170
416.
Weintraub PG. The Importance of Publishing Negative Results. Journal of Insect Science. 2016;16(1):109. doi:10.1093/jisesa/iew092
417.
Altman DG, Bland JM. Statistics notes: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. BMJ. 1995;311(7003):485–485. doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7003.485
418.
Gelman A, Carlin J. Beyond Power Calculations. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2014;9(6):641–651. doi:10.1177/1745691614551642
419.
Lu J, Qiu Y, Deng A. A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 2018;72(1):1–17. doi:10.1111/bmsp.12132
420.
Breznau N, Rinke EM, Wuttke A, et al. Observing many researchers using the same data and hypothesis reveals a hidden universe of uncertainty. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2022;(44):e2203150119. doi:10.1073/pnas.2203150119
421.
Kim N, Fischer AH, Dyring-Andersen B, Rosner B, Okoye GA. Research Techniques Made Simple: Choosing Appropriate Statistical Methods for Clinical Research. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2017;137(10):e173–e178. doi:10.1016/j.jid.2017.08.007
422.
Marusteri M, Bacarea V. Comparing groups for statistical differences: how to choose the right statistical test? Biochemia Medica. 2010:15–32. doi:10.11613/bm.2010.004
423.
Mishra P, Pandey C, Singh U, Keshri A, Sabaretnam M. Selection of appropriate statistical methods for data analysis. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia. 2019;22(3):297. doi:10.4103/aca.aca_248_18
424.
Ray A, Najmi A, Sadasivam B. How to choose and interpret a statistical test? An update for budding researchers. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2021;10(8):2763. doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_433_21
425.
Nayak B, Hazra A. How to choose the right statistical test? Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2011;59(2):85. doi:10.4103/0301-4738.77005
426.
Shankar S, Singh R. Demystifying statistics: How to choose a statistical test? Indian Journal of Rheumatology. 2014;9(2):77–81. doi:10.1016/j.injr.2014.04.002
427.
Wasserstein RL, Lazar NA. The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician. 2016;70(2):129–133. doi:10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108
428.
Altman N, Krzywinski M. P values and the search for significance. Nature Methods. 2017;14(1):3–4. doi:10.1038/nmeth.4120
429.
LATTER OH. THE EGG OF CUCULUS CANORUS: AN ENQUIRY INTO THE DIMENSIONS OF THE CUCKOO’S EGO AND THE RELATION OF THE VARIATIONS TO THE SIZE OF THE EGGS OF THE FOSTER-PARENT, WITH NOTES ON COLORATION, &c. Biometrika. 1902;1(2):164–176. doi:10.1093/biomet/1.2.164
430.
Aylmer Fisher R. The arrangement of field experiments. Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries. 1926. doi:10.23637/ROTHAMSTED.8V61Q
431.
Zhu M. The rule of three, proof by contradiction, and uncertainty. Math Horizons. 2026;33(3):16–20. doi:10.1080/10724117.2025.2580363
432.
Lakens D, Caldwell A. Simulation-Based Power Analysis for Factorial Analysis of Variance Designs. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. 2021;4:251524592095150. doi:10.1177/2515245920951503
433.
Blume JD, D’Agostino McGowan L, Dupont WD, Greevy RA. Second-generation p-values: Improved rigor, reproducibility, & transparency in statistical analyses. Smalheiser NR, org. PLOS ONE. 2018;13(3):e0188299. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0188299
434.
Lakens D, Delacre M. Equivalence Testing and the Second Generation P-Value. Meta-Psychology. 2020;4. doi:10.15626/mp.2018.933
435.
Kim HY. Statistical notes for clinical researchers: effect size. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics. 2015;40(4):328. doi:10.5395/rde.2015.40.4.328
436.
Aragon TJ. epitools: Epidemiology Tools.; 2020. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.epitools
437.
Ben-Shachar MS, Lüdecke D, Makowski D. effectsize: Estimation of Effect Size Indices and Standardized Parameters. Journal of Open Source Software. 2020;5:2815. doi:10.21105/joss.02815
438.
Champely S. pwr: Basic Functions for Power Analysis.; 2020. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pwr.
439.
GREENLAND S, SCHLESSELMAN JJ, CRIQUI MH. THE FALLACY OF EMPLOYING STANDARDIZED REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS AND CORRELATIONS AS MEASURES OF EFFECT. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1986;123(2):203–208. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114229
440.
Greenland S, Maclure M, Schlesselman JJ, Poole C, Morgenstern H. Standardized Regression Coefficients. Epidemiology. 1991;2(5):387–392. doi:10.1097/00001648-199109000-00015
441.
Makowski D, Wiernik BM, Patil I, Lüdecke D, Ben-Shachar MS. correlation: Methods for Correlation Analysis.; 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=correlation.
442.
Lüdecke D, Ben-Shachar MS, Patil I, et al. easystats: Framework for Easy Statistical Modeling, Visualization, and Reporting.; 2022. https://easystats.github.io/easystats/.
443.
Dahlke JA, Wiernik BM. psychmeta: An R Package for Psychometric Meta-Analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement. 2018;43(3):415–416. doi:10.1177/0146621618795933
444.
William Revelle. psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych.
445.
Bonett DG. statpsych: Statistical Methods for Psychologists.; 2026. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.statpsych
446.
Fox J. polycor: Polychoric and Polyserial Correlations.; 2025. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.polycor
447.
Menzel U. CCP: Significance Tests for Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA).; 2022. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.CCP
448.
Hochman B, Nahas FX, Oliveira Filho RS de, Ferreira LM. Desenhos de pesquisa. Acta Cirurgica Brasileira. 2005;20(suppl 2):2–9. doi:10.1590/s0102-86502005000800002
449.
Mathieu E. Research Note: Blinding: what, why, when and how? Journal of Physiotherapy. 2020;66(1):61–63. doi:10.1016/j.jphys.2019.11.017
450.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes: Matching. BMJ. 1994;309(6962):1128–1128. doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6962.1128
451.
Shibasaki WM, Martins RP. Simple randomization may lead to unequal group sizes. Is that a problem? American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2018;154(4):600–605. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.07.005
452.
Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal. 2009;26(2):91–108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
453.
Sut N. Study Designs in Medicine. Balkan Medical Journal. 2015;31(4):273–277. doi:10.5152/balkanmedj.2014.1408
454.
Souza AC de, Alexandre NMC, Guirardello E de B, Souza AC de, Alexandre NMC, Guirardello E de B. Propriedades psicométricas na avaliação de instrumentos: avaliação da confiabilidade e da validade. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde. 2017;26(3):649–659. doi:10.5123/s1679-49742017000300022
455.
Reeves BC, Wells GA, Waddington H. Quasi-experimental study designs seriespaper 5: a checklist for classifying studies evaluating the effects on health interventionsa taxonomy without labels. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2017;89:30–42. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.02.016
456.
Echevarría-Guanilo ME, Gonçalves N, Romanoski PJ. PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS: CONCEPTUAL BASIS AND EVALUATION METHODS – PART II. Texto & Contexto – Enfermagem. 2019;28. doi:10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2017-0311
457.
Chassé M, Fergusson DA. Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine. 2019;49(2):87–93. doi:10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2018.11.005
458.
Chidambaram AG, Josephson M. Clinical research study designs: The essentials. PEDIATRIC INVESTIGATION. 2019;3(4):245–252. doi:10.1002/ped4.12166
459.
Erdemir A, Mulugeta L, Ku JP, et al. Credible practice of modeling and simulation in healthcare: ten rules from a multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2020;18(1). doi:10.1186/s12967-020-02540-4
460.
Yang B, Olsen M, Vali Y, et al. Study designs for comparative diagnostic test accuracy: A methodological review and classification scheme. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2021;138:128–138. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.04.013
461.
Chipman H, Bingham D. Let’s practice what we preach: Planning and interpreting simulation studies with design and analysis of experiments. Canadian Journal of Statistics. 2022;50(4):1228–1249. doi:10.1002/cjs.11719
462.
Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research. 2021;133:285–296. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
463.
Lim WM, Kumar S. Guidelines for interpreting the results of bibliometric analysis: A sensemaking approach. Global Business and Organizational Excellence. agosto 2023. doi:10.1002/joe.22229
464.
Haynes RB. Of studies, summaries, synopses, and systems: the “4S” evolution of services for finding current best evidence. Evidence Based Mental Health. 2001;4(2):37–38. doi:10.1136/ebmh.4.2.37
465.
Brian Haynes R. Of studies, syntheses, synopses, summaries, and systems: the "5S" evolution of information services for evidence-based healthcare decisions. Evidence-Based Medicine. 2006;11(6):162–164. doi:10.1136/ebm.11.6.162-a
466.
DiCenso A, Bayley L, Haynes RB. Accessing pre-appraised evidence: fine-tuning the 5S model into a 6S model. Evidence Based Nursing. 2009;12(4):99.2–101. doi:10.1136/ebn.12.4.99-b
467.
Shaneyfelt T. Pyramids are guides not rules: the evolution of the evidence pyramid. Evidence Based Medicine. 2016;21(4):121–122. doi:10.1136/ebmed-2016-110498
468.
Bellini V, Ori E, Coccolini F, Bignami E. Evidence pyramid and artificial intelligence: a metamorphosis of clinical research. Discover Health Systems. 2023;2(1). doi:10.1007/s44250-023-00050-w
469.
Tomlin G, Borgetto B. Research Pyramid: A New Evidence-Based Practice Model for Occupational Therapy. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2011;65(2):189–196. doi:10.5014/ajot.2011.000828
470.
Berlin JA, Golub RM. Meta-analysis as Evidence. JAMA. 2014;312(6):603. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.8167
471.
Murad MH, Asi N, Alsawas M, Alahdab F. New evidence pyramid. Evidence Based Medicine. 2016;21(4):125–127. doi:10.1136/ebmed-2016-110401
472.
Gelman A, Vehtari A, McElreath R. Statistical workflow. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2026;384(2321). doi:10.1098/rsta.2025.0293
473.
Lundberg I, Johnson R, Stewart BM. What Is Your Estimand? Defining the Target Quantity Connects Statistical Evidence to Theory. American Sociological Review. 2021;86(3):532–565. doi:10.1177/00031224211004187
474.
Heckman MG, Davis JM, Crowson CS. Post Hoc Power Calculations: An Inappropriate Method for Interpreting the Findings of a Research Study. The Journal of Rheumatology. 2022;49(8):867–870. doi:10.3899/jrheum.211115
475.
Iddi S, Donohue MC. Power and Sample Size for Longitudinal Models in R – The longpower Package and Shiny App. The R Journal. 2022;14:264–282.
476.
Baranger DAA, Finsaas MC, Goldstein BL, Vize CE, Lynam DR, Olino TM. Tutorial: Power Analyses for Interaction Effects in Cross-Sectional Regressions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. 2023;6(3):25152459231187531. doi:10.1177/25152459231187531
477.
Hoenig JM, Heisey DM. The Abuse of Power. The American Statistician. 2001;55(1):19–24. doi:10.1198/000313001300339897
478.
Perugini M, Gallucci M, Costantini G. Safeguard Power as a Protection Against Imprecise Power Estimates. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2014;9(3):319–332. doi:10.1177/1745691614528519
479.
Rodríguez del Águila M, González-Ramírez A. Sample size calculation. Allergologia et Immunopathologia. 2014;42(5):485–492. doi:10.1016/j.aller.2013.03.008
480.
Bacchetti P. Ethics and Sample Size. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2005;161(2):105–110. doi:10.1093/aje/kwi014
481.
Ahmed SK. Sample size for saturation in qualitative research: Debates, definitions, and strategies. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health. 2025;5:100171. doi:10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100171
482.
Hennink M, Kaiser BN. Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine. 2022;292:114523. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
483.
Wutich A, Beresford M, Bernard HR. Sample Sizes for 10 Types of Qualitative Data Analysis: An Integrative Review, Empirical Guidance, and Next Steps. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2024;23. doi:10.1177/16094069241296206
484.
Vasileiou K, Barnett J, Thorpe S, Young T. Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2018;18(1). doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7
485.
Ying X, Robinson KA, Ehrhardt S. Re-evaluating the role of pilot trials in informing effect and sample size estimates for full-scale trials: a meta-epidemiological study. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine. 2023;28(6):383–391. doi:10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112358
486.
Andrade C. Sample Size and its Importance in Research. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine. 2020;42(1):102–103. doi:10.4103/ijpsym.ijpsym_504_19
487.
Andrade C. Target Trial Emulation. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2025;86(1). doi:10.4088/jcp.25f15796
488.
Elm E von, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2007;147(8):573. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010
489.
Gussenbauer J, Kowarik A, Vattheuer E, Cillia G de. surveysd: Survey Standard Error Estimation for Cumulated Estimates and their Differences in Complex Panel Designs.; 2026. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.surveysd
490.
Sharma A, Minh Duc NT, Luu Lam Thang T, et al. A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS). Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2021;36(10):3179–3187. doi:10.1007/s11606-021-06737-1
491.
Pitt SC, Schwartz TA, Chu D. AAPOR Reporting Guidelines for Survey Studies. JAMA Surgery. abril 2021. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0543
492.
Grimshaw J. SURGE (The SUrvey Reporting GuidelinE). Guidelines for Reporting Health Research: A User’s Manual. julho 2014:206–213. doi:10.1002/9781118715598.ch20
493.
Eysenbach G. Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2004;6(3):e34. doi:10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34
494.
Lopez Bernal J, Soumerai S, Gasparrini A. A methodological framework for model selection in interrupted time series studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2018;103:82–91. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.026
495.
Reeves BC, Gaus W. Guidelines for Reporting Non-Randomised Studies. Complementary Medicine Research. 2004;11(1):46–52. doi:10.1159/000080576
496.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparisons within randomised groups can be very misleading. BMJ. 2011;342(may06 2):d561–d561. doi:10.1136/bmj.d561
497.
Bruce CL, Juszczak E, Ogollah R, Partlett C, Montgomery A. A systematic review of randomisation method use in RCTs and association of trial design characteristics with method selection. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2022;22(1). doi:10.1186/s12874-022-01786-4
498.
Vickers AJ, Altman DG. Statistics Notes: Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements. BMJ. 2001;323(7321):1123–1124. doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1123
499.
O Connell NS, Dai L, Jiang Y, et al. Methods for Analysis of Pre-Post Data in Clinical Research: A Comparison of Five Common Methods. Journal of Biometrics & Biostatistics. 2017;08(01). doi:10.4172/2155-6180.1000334
500.
Laird N. Further Comparative Analyses of Pretest-Posttest Research Designs. The American Statistician. 1983;37(4a):329–330. doi:10.1080/00031305.1983.10483133
501.
Cnaan A, Laird NM, Slasor P. Using the general linear mixed model to analyse unbalanced repeated measures and longitudinal data. Statistics in Medicine. 1997;16(20):2349–2380. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19971030)16:20<2349::aid-sim667>3.0.co;2-e
502.
Mallinckrodt CH, Lane PW, Schnell D, Peng Y, Mancuso JP. Recommendations for the Primary Analysis of Continuous Endpoints in Longitudinal Clinical Trials. Drug Information Journal. 2008;42(4):303–319. doi:10.1177/009286150804200402
503.
Assmann SF, Pocock SJ, Enos LE, Kasten LE. Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials. The Lancet. 2000;355(9209):1064–1069. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02039-0
504.
Stang A, Baethge C. Imbalance <em>p</em> values for baseline covariates in randomized controlled trials: a last resort for the use of <em>p</em> values? A pro and contra debate. Clinical Epidemiology. 2018;Volume 10:531–535. doi:10.2147/clep.s161508
505.
Greifer N. cobalt: Covariate Balance Tables and Plots. 2026. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.cobalt
506.
Bolzern JE, Mitchell A, Torgerson DJ. Baseline testing in cluster randomised controlled trials: should this be done? BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2019;19(1). doi:10.1186/s12874-019-0750-8
507.
Lavori PW, Louis TA, Bailar JC, Polansky M. Designs for Experiments Parallel Comparisons of Treatment. New England Journal of Medicine. 1983;309(21):1291–1299. doi:10.1056/nejm198311243092105
508.
Altman DG. Comparability of Randomised Groups. The Statistician. 1985;34(1):125. doi:10.2307/2987510
509.
Altman DG, Doré CJ. Randomisation and baseline comparisons in clinical trials. The Lancet. 1990;335(8682):149–153. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(90)90014-v
510.
Roberts C, Torgerson DJ. Understanding controlled trials: Baseline imbalance in randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 1999;319(7203):185–185. doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7203.185
511.
Gruijters SLK. Baseline comparisons and covariate fishing: Bad statistical habits we should have broken yesterday. julho 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/qftwg.
512.
Vickers AJ. The use of percentage change from baseline as an outcome in a controlled trial is statistically inefficient: a simulation study. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2001;1(1). doi:10.1186/1471-2288-1-6
513.
Brookes ST, Whitely E, Egger M, Smith GD, Mulheran PA, Peters TJ. Subgroup analyses in randomized trials: risks of subgroup-specific analyses; Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2004;57(3):229–236. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.08.009
514.
Matthews JNS, Altman DG. Statistics Notes: Interaction 2: compare effect sizes not P values. BMJ. 1996;313(7060):808–808. doi:10.1136/bmj.313.7060.808
515.
Altman DG. Statistics Notes: Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates. BMJ. 2003;326(7382):219–219. doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7382.219
516.
Hauck WW, Anderson S, Marcus SM. Should We Adjust for Covariates in Nonlinear Regression Analyses of Randomized Trials? Controlled Clinical Trials. 1998;19(3):249–256. doi:10.1016/s0197-2456(97)00147-5
517.
Kahan BC, Jairath V, Doré CJ, Morris TP. The risks and rewards of covariate adjustment in randomized trials: an assessment of 12 outcomes from 8 studies. Trials. 2014;15(1). doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-139
518.
Cao Y, Allore H, Vander Wyk B, Gutman R. Review and evaluation of imputation methods for multivariate longitudinal data with mixed-type incomplete variables. Statistics in Medicine. outubro 2022. doi:10.1002/sim.9592
519.
Austin PC, Buuren S van. Logistic regression vs. predictive mean matching for imputing binary covariates. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. setembro 2023. doi:10.1177/09622802231198795
520.
Schulz KF. CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2010;152(11):726. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232
521.
Wellek S, Blettner M. On the Proper Use of the Crossover Design in Clinical Trials. Deutsches Ärzteblatt international. abril 2012. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2012.0276
522.
Rosenkranz GK. Analysis of cross-over studies with missing data. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. 2014;24(4):420–433. doi:10.1177/0962280214521349
523.
Dwan K, Li T, Altman DG, Elbourne D. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised crossover trials. BMJ. julho 2019:l4378. doi:10.1136/bmj.l4378
524.
Senn S. The analysis of continuous data from n-of-1 trials using paired cycles: a simple tutorial. Trials. 2024;25(1). doi:10.1186/s13063-024-07964-7
525.
Chatters R, Hawksworth O, Julious S, Cook A. The development of a set of key points to aid clinicians and researchers in designing and conducting n-of-1 trials. Trials. 2024;25(1). doi:10.1186/s13063-024-08261-z
526.
Hawksworth O, Chatters R, Julious S, et al. A methodological review of randomised n-of-1 trials. Trials. 2024;25(1). doi:10.1186/s13063-024-08100-1
527.
Sarkar D. Lattice: Multivariate Data Visualization with R.; 2008. http://lmdvr.r-forge.r-project.org.
528.
Steckelberg A, Balgenorth A, Berger J, Mühlhauser I. Explaining computation of predictive values: 2 × 2 table versus frequency tree. A randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN74278823]. BMC Medical Education. 2004;4(1). doi:10.1186/1472-6920-4-13
529.
Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper: Papers that report diagnostic or screening tests. BMJ. 1997;315(7107):540–543. doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7107.540
530.
Neth H, Gaisbauer F, Gradwohl N, Gaissmaier W. riskyr: Rendering Risk Literacy more Transparent.; 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=riskyr.
531.
Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios. BMJ. 2004;329(7458):168–169. doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7458.168
532.
Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH, Bonsel GJ, Bossuyt PMM. The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2003;56(11):1129–1135. doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00177-x
533.
Xu J, Zhang Y, Miao D. Three-way confusion matrix for classification: A measure driven view. Information Sciences. 2020;507:772–794. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2019.06.064
534.
He Z, Zhang Q, Song M, Tan X, Wang W. Four overlooked errors in ROC analysis: how to prevent and avoid. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine. 2024;30(3):208–211. doi:10.1136/bmjebm-2024-113078
535.
Park SH, Goo JM, Jo CH. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve: Practical Review for Radiologists. Korean Journal of Radiology. 2004;5(1):11. doi:10.3348/kjr.2004.5.1.11
536.
Park SH, Goo JM, Jo CH. UniODA vs ROC Analysis: Computing the “optimal” cut-point. Optimal Data Analysis. 2014;3(14):117–120. https://odajournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/v3a29.pdf.
537.
Hond AAH de, Steyerberg EW, Calster B van. Interpreting area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The Lancet Digital Health. 2022;4(12):e853–e855. doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(22)00188-1
538.
Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, et al. pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:77. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-77
539.
Ferreira ADS, Meziat-Filho N, Ferreira APA. Double threshold receiver operating characteristic plot for three-modal continuous predictors. Computational Statistics. 2021;36(3):2231–2245. doi:10.1007/s00180-021-01080-9
540.
Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ. outubro 2015:h5527. doi:10.1136/bmj.h5527
541.
Scott WA. Reliability of Content Analysis: The Case of Nominal Scale Coding. Public Opinion Quarterly. 1955;19(3):321. doi:10.1086/266577
542.
Cohen J. A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1960;20(1):37–46. doi:10.1177/001316446002000104
543.
Gamer M, Lemon J, Ian Fellows Puspendra Singh. irr: Various Coefficients of Interrater Reliability and Agreement.; 2019. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.irr
544.
Lehnert B. BlandAltmanLeh: Plots (Slightly Extended) Bland-Altman Plots.; 2015. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=BlandAltmanLeh.
545.
Banerjee M, Capozzoli M, McSweeney L, Sinha D. Beyond kappa: A review of interrater agreement measures. Canadian Journal of Statistics. 1999;27(1):3–23. doi:10.2307/3315487
546.
Contributors semTools. semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling.; 2016. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools.
547.
Quartagno M, Carpenter J. jomo: A package for Multilevel Joint Modelling Multiple Imputation.; 2023. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=jomo.
548.
Kottner J, Audigé L, Brorson S, et al. Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2011;64(1):96–106. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002
549.
Rosseel Y. lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software. 2012;48. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
550.
Findley MG, Kikuta K, Denly M. External Validity. Annual Review of Political Science. 2021;24(1):365–393. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102556
551.
Gagnier JJ, Lai J, Mokkink LB, Terwee CB. COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research. 2021;30(8):2197–2218. doi:10.1007/s11136-021-02822-4
552.
Streiner DL, Kottner J. Recommendations for reporting the results of studies of instrument and scale development and testing. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2014;70(9):1970–1979. doi:10.1111/jan.12402
553.
Gould, Elliot, Gray, et al. aggreCAT: An R Package for Mathematically Aggregating Expert Judgments.; 2023.
554.
Niederberger M, Schifano J, Deckert S, et al. Delphi studies in social and health sciencesRecommendations for an interdisciplinary standardized reporting (DELPHISTAR). Results of a Delphi study. Oliveira MDC de, org. PLOS ONE. 2024;19(8):e0304651. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0304651
555.
Morris TP, White IR, Crowther MJ. Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods. Statistics in Medicine. 2019;38(11):2074–2102. doi:10.1002/sim.8086
556.
Boulesteix AL, Groenwold RH, Abrahamowicz M, et al. Introduction to statistical simulations in health research. BMJ Open. 2020;10(12):e039921. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039921
557.
Bürkner PC, Schmitt M, Radev ST. Simulations in statistical workflows. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2026;384(2321). doi:10.1098/rsta.2024.0616
558.
Erdemir A, Mulugeta L, Ku JP, et al. Credible practice of modeling and simulation in healthcare: ten rules from a multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of Translational Medicine. 2020;18(1). doi:10.1186/s12967-020-02540-4
559.
Trisovic A, Lau MK, Pasquier T, Crosas M. A large-scale study on research code quality and execution. Scientific Data. 2022;9(1). doi:10.1038/s41597-022-01143-6
560.
Metropolis N, Ulam S. The Monte Carlo Method. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1949;44(247):335–341. doi:10.1080/01621459.1949.10483310
561.
Goldfeld K, Wujciak-Jens J. simstudy: Illuminating research methods through data generation. Journal of Open Source Software. 2020;5:2763. doi:10.21105/joss.02763
562.
DeBruine L. faux: Simulation for Factorial Designs.; 2023. doi:10.5281/zenodo.2669586
563.
White IR, Pham TM, Quartagno M, Morris TP. How to check a simulation study. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2023;53(1). doi:10.1093/ije/dyad134
564.
Gasparini A. rsimsum: Summarise results from Monte Carlo simulation studies. V 3.; 2018:739. doi:10.21105/joss.00739
565.
Monks T, Currie CSM, Onggo BS, Robinson S, Kunc M, Taylor SJE. Strengthening the reporting of empirical simulation studies: Introducing the STRESS guidelines. Journal of Simulation. 2018;13(1):55–67. doi:10.1080/17477778.2018.1442155
566.
O’Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Drabble SJ, Rudolph A, Hewison J. What can qualitative research do for randomised controlled trials? A systematic mapping review. BMJ Open. 2013;3(6):e002889. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002889
567.
O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research. Academic Medicine. 2014;89(9):1245–1251. doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000000388
568.
Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig J. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2012;12(1). doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-181
569.
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
570.
Baker KA, Weeks SM. An Overview of Systematic Review. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing. 2014;29(6):454–458. doi:10.1016/j.jopan.2014.07.002
571.
Fantini D. easyPubMed: Search and Retrieve Scientific Publication Records from PubMed.; 2019. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.easyPubMed
572.
Chamberlain S, Zhu H, Jahn N, Boettiger C, Ram K. rcrossref: Client for Various CrossRef APIs.; 2022. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.rcrossref
573.
Jahn N. roadoi: Find Free Versions of Scholarly Publications via Unpaywall.; 2024. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.roadoi
574.
Silva V, Grande AJ, Martimbianco ALC, Riera R, Carvalho APV. Overview of systematic reviews - a new type of study: part I: why and for whom? Sao Paulo Medical Journal. 2012;130(6):398–404. doi:10.1590/s1516-31802012000600007
575.
Silva V, Grande AJ, Carvalho APV de, Martimbianco ALC, Riera R. Overview of systematic reviews - a new type of study. Part II. Sao Paulo Medical Journal. 2014;133(3):206–217. doi:10.1590/1516-3180.2013.8150015
576.
Stern C, Li J, Stone J, et al. Data analysis and presentation methods in umbrella reviews/overviews of reviews in health care: A cross-sectional study. Research Synthesis Methods. outubro 2025:1–15. doi:10.1017/rsm.2025.10040
577.
Snell KIE, Levis B, Damen JAA, et al. Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA). BMJ. maio 2023:e073538. doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-073538
578.
Moons KGM, Groot JAH de, Bouwmeester W, et al. Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist. PLoS Medicine. 2014;11(10):e1001744. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001744
579.
Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods. 2010;1(2):97–111. doi:10.1002/jrsm.12
580.
Viechtbauer W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. V 36.; 2010. doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03
581.
Balduzzi S, Rücker G, Nikolakopoulou A, et al. netmeta: An R Package for Network Meta-Analysis Using Frequentist Methods. Journal of Statistical Software. 2023;106(2):1–40. doi:10.18637/jss.v106.i02
582.
Valkenhoef G van, Kuiper J. gemtc: Network Meta-Analysis Using Bayesian Methods.; 2025. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.gemtc
583.
Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2005;5(1). doi:10.1186/1471-2288-5-13
584.
Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2014;14(1). doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-135
585.
Borenstein M. In a meta-analysis, the I-squared statistic does not tell us how much the effect size varies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. outubro 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.10.003
586.
Rücker G, Schwarzer G, Carpenter JR, Schumacher M. Undue reliance on I 2 in assessing heterogeneity may mislead. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2008;8(1). doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-79
587.
Grooth HJ de, Parienti JJ. Heterogeneity between studies can be explained more reliably with individual patient data. Intensive Care Medicine. julho 2023. doi:10.1007/s00134-023-07163-z
588.
Dettori JR, Norvell DC, Chapman JR. Seeing the Forest by Looking at the Trees: How to Interpret a Meta-Analysis Forest Plot. Global Spine Journal. 2021;11(4):614–616. doi:10.1177/21925682211003889
589.
Phillips B, Stewart LA, Sutton AJ. ‘Cross hairs’ plots for diagnostic meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods. 2010;1(3-4):308–315. doi:10.1002/jrsm.26
590.
Sousa-Pinto PD with contributions from B. mada: Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy.; 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mada.
591.
Sterne JAC, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JPA, et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2011;343(jul22 1):d4002–d4002. doi:10.1136/bmj.d4002
592.
Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629–634. doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
593.
Peters JL. Comparison of Two Methods to Detect Publication Bias in Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2006;295(6):676. doi:10.1001/jama.295.6.676
594.
Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel-PlotBased Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis. Biometrics. 2000;56(2):455–463. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x
595.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLOS Medicine. 2021;18(3):e1003583. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583
596.
Lajeunesse MJ. Facilitating systematic reviews, data extraction, and meta-analysis with the metagear package for R. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2016;7(3):323–330. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12472
597.
Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews. 2015;4(1). doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
598.
Gates M, Gates A, Pieper D, et al. Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement. BMJ. agosto 2022:e070849. doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-070849